Is Tickle the Future of the Movie Industry?
August 24, 2020 - The first full-length animated movie with realistic-looking humans, "Tickle" opens tonight. It is an intriguing thriller about a woman who gets framed by her husband, but the most intriguing is to see if you can spot the difference between real actors and these created by computers.
Computer animation has developed a lot since the first full-length movie "Toy Story" in 1995, and the first attempt of a full-length movie with humans "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within" in 2001. The challenge and difficulties to create humans in animation lies mainly in the eye of the beholder, since we are so trained to see human behavior, movements, facial expressions etc.
Many people state that this is the future of the movie industry, since you don't have to pay actors US$ 25 million to appear in a movie, you can just license his face as a trademark if you like and let the computers do the rest. However, there is still some time left before this type of movies will save money for the studios; the budget for "Tickle" was about US$ 190 million.
They have also taken the opportunity it gives to re-create actors that are no longer active. A lot of effort was made to give a supporting role to the like of James Dean, a successful movie star that was tragically killed in a car accident 65 years ago. However, all resemblance between the tall homosexual clerk with the high-pitched voice saying "I'll be back" and the former action hero of the 1990s Arnold Schwarzenegger, is purely coincidental according to the director.
So, to the big question, can you see that the movie is only made by computers with no real actors? Well, go and see for yourself tonight!
Argument: Since the speed for processing information is constantly increasing and the cost decreasing, it will be possible to make more advanced animated movies. Software development is also a key to develop more realistic-looking humans. Movie studios that are not depending on established actors will be able to act more flexible.
Questions: If you can't tell the difference between an animated and real footage, is there a risk that news can be fabricated, like a president giving a speech with a different meaning than the original? Will people be interested in movies that look like it has real actors, but are only computer generated? How will quantum computing affect the rendering of animated movies when it becomes available later on?



April 12, 2040 - Although introduced in the market only five years ago, 10% of all hydrogen fuel now sold in the US is of the enviromental friendly Re-Hydro label, produced through electrolysis based on a source of 100% renewable energy.

April 5, 2030 - The international collaboration for the first manned mission to Mars presented today the final plans for the trip next year. Take off will be January 24 and after about five months in space they will land on Martian soil on June 28. The countdown for one of the greatest adventures ever has started.
March 13, 2025 - The latest efforts in getting in contact with the Voyager probes have not been successful and today it was officially announced that we have lost the contact with them forever. The last signal from Voyager 1 was received in November 2020 and from Voyager 2 in March 2020.
February 14, 2025 - Today is the release of the first home computer with the new 4 THz microprocessor, currently the highest performing processor available. Several analysts have doubted of the need of the 4THz processor for the home market, but the pre-sale for the last couple of weeks look positive according to the manufacturer.
January 19, 2035 - According to the latest statistics presented this week, 1 million hydrogen-fueled cars have now been sold in the US. The figures for last year show an increase in sales by 50% from 2033.
January 8, 2035 - With a first prize of seven million US dollar and the intriguing plot of trying to fool or outsmart Arnold, the most advanced artificial intelligence in public use, the much hyped live show “Fooling Arnold” became the people’s choice this Saturday.
December 20, 2030 - The launch yesterday of the virtual realistic-looking human newscaster from Simple News gained rave reviews. Others have made several attempts earlier, but this sends the live newscasters in to a pretty shaky future.
December 18, 2020 - This year shows strong growth for wind power when the total global installed capacity added a record 62,000 MW, making the total capacity more than 680,000 MW. Wind power is by far the renewable source with the largest growth in worldwide capacity during the last decade.
December 15, 2030 - There's no doubt what the most popular Christmas present will be this year. Influenced by the launch of the first manned mission to Mars next month, you will most likely get a present with stars, a gift card for a spacetrip.

Comments:
this is so awesome how did you do dat
Posted by: Brittney McCutcheon
I cant wait for this
Posted by: Chris m.
I have been debating this topic for years with film-industry friends.
No matter how realistic a cgi character may be, it will never replace the commanding performance of a great actor, or particurally the interaction between two great actors. It can be replicated to a degree... but not created.
Posted by: rambozo
I agree with you rambozo that it will not replace movies as we know them today, we will always be interested in seeing "real" actors. However, I believe the makers of these animated films will learn by time and eventually you will not be able to tell the difference.
Posted by: Pontus Edenberg
i think that they shouldn't make movies using animation(life-like humans) because then maybe all animators may start firing actors and actors/actresses may become unwealthy!!!!!
Posted by: hippy
I have 12 now.. and I'll survive to see that..
Posted by: Lucca
Yes they will be changed by cgi's, unfortuntely
I know you are thinkin I'm wrong.. but I know so many things about the future..
I born in 2030.
Posted by: Kreagory Swong
I don't believe that CGI will totally replace human actors because movie studios are "using" real actors (through publicity) even if they're not in a movie (ads, public appearances, etc). Except that, the actor must be a human in order to became a "Star". Star means that he will have fans, etc. This is not possible with a CGI actor.
Posted by: Antonios Dimopoulos
I saw tickle 5 years ago, the internet 2 told us who the fake characters were.
Posted by: Julian
I think this is incredible. woot woot
Posted by: Tim
I think Antonios doesn't have a good argument there. Also CGI actors can become stars, even if they can't be photographed by paparazzi.
I guess there will be always need of real actors, at least for motion capturing.
So I agree with rambozo and Pontus.
Posted by: Andreas - News of the future
being born in 1991, i have sure seen the beginning of movie animation and boy has it improved so much, god knows what it will be like in another 35 - 40 yeara!!
Posted by: Connor Patterson
The pyramid movie is coming.
Posted by: Eye on top of the...
Wow! This is awesome. Just think how cheap movies could get with this. It will explode the industry.
Posted by: J Kellogg
they already did that, the movie beowulf is a full-length animated movie with realistic-looking humans
Posted by: mohammed
Mohammed, I agree with you that Beowulf is very well made, but you can still see that it is done through motion capture (recording the action of human actors). Tickle will not need motion capture, it will be 100% animated.
Posted by: Pontus Edenberg
I think that actors and actresses could still be rich with the producers paying their faces for a price. I for one would think this is cool, but boring. I would rather see something that is truelly magnificent as far as acting goes. CGI's would be man-made and you can't replace real actors.
Posted by: Rachel
interesting discussions so far,i'm currently looking at the synthespian as an actor.the fact that there are doubts that these cgi actors will be famous or not,whether real actors will be needed anymore or that cgi relies on motion capture is following a pattern, like the doubts that man will never be able to fly...i believe cgi actors will work alongside real actors, and the money in the industry will sore.
Posted by: T
hi ppl lol i like movies...... thats all i got to say. i think its impossible to totally 100% replicate real movie stars and stuff like that.
Posted by: jdsa
You need a farm of a million computers housed in an area 100 times the current size of Skywalker Ranch to render a resolution of more than a zillion pixels to make the actor look real.
Posted by: Nelson Tan
The real question is not whether this is doable. I think it's technically doable right now. It's been doable as long as there have been cartoons. It's just presently impractical. The question is whether it will ever truly be cheaper and/or easier than using real actors. Unless you cheat by using actors behind the scenes to get motions and expressiveness, i think it will not be. You could totally change the way people look in the movies tho. This could mean a clean separation between models who provide the pretty faces and actors who provide realistic personality and behavior.
Posted by: some anonymous person
i want to have one of these!
Posted by: alexis
I am so mad. I thought this was for real... ERG. x-(
Posted by: Anonymous
The technology to support this is arguably the one to support a second digital life. We'll just have to "extract" our own psychological profile/character and upload it to an AI player which will perform (according to AI definition) at a level where our friends won't distinguish the original from the copy. Think about all these opportunities - and start archive your "souls" today if you think this is going to happen in the future. Aren't you courious about living in a digital heaven?
Posted by: Steve
This could actually be the reality of today. We can probably already do this, and who knows, it might have already been done. Lets get a story that sounds more futuristic that this!
Posted by: Future News
yo i think they def already gots that kind of technology. They just don't want to put entertainers out of they jobs. They could probably trick alot of people.
Posted by: bigman
lMba5A hi! nice site!
Posted by: zibex
September 25, 2050 - President Britney Spears outlaws animated media with realistic-looking humans.
In a recent statement, President Spears said "I may have been able to fake my singing on stage, but I will prevent this type of fraud from happening when it comes to politics.
FCC Comissioner Paris Hilton commended the President saying: "God knows we don't need to be watching all sorts of crap on video." Ironically, this comes on the 60th Anniversary of the DVD which chronicals the conception, birth and childhood of Ms. Hilton's first child, Hilton Garden Inn, which some thought too risque for immersive 3D HD HoloVision.
Posted by: Ferdinand Burfopolis
I highly doubt that animation would pass REAL films, especially within the next 20-100 years.
The film industry thrives on media and celebrity gossip/image...Of course animations can have an image, Toy story and Shrek are very successful but still won't pass real films.
Think of what non animated films will look like in this time too, probably just as improved as any animation.
Posted by: Dylan
I agree, but if movie directors hold auditions and they can't find the right person, they MIGHT use animation, subsituting real actors.
Posted by: Caroline
This is very true. Future of film indutsry lies in it.Actors can perform serious complcated tasks. You can create whole movie from your PC. The best movie will be released in theatres. What elst that then everyone will get a chance to exprss its ideas in the form o movies. I think 2020 is far off date. It will be done by 2015
Posted by: ashish
There above me was a ton of spam. Ugg! Some people these days? A message after I tried to send my comment the first time prevented my thoughts or because I can't add 1+2.
Okay, Rather than comment now on this thread, Or maybe I will towards the end...
I MUST say, I have been needing a web site like this for the longest time. It didn't take me long at all to BookMark it, Man! Tell all your friends about this one, Babe!
This site is so thought provoking and stimulating! Ugg! I wish I could still live, love and learn another 50 years! Death is such a pain in the...
Anyhow, I am not in the least religious. If you could really conceive of the vast reality of Time/Space and how insignificant even our massive Sun is to the Universe around it, Well...
All those billions of years after the big bang and all that is possible and all we don't know, maybe we all really do have a timeless Spirit.
After all, even one dead cell on the back of our hand is made of bits of stars that have been dead Billions of years. Even before our Milky Galaxy was born.
Re-incarnation anyone? New Game?
Don't just clone my old face for the 3-D movies, clone my mind while you are at it!
For the kids, 40 and less, clone their faces. they might want them back someday.
Remember Moores Law? Not Murphy fool! Let' all get that Murphy guy! There HE IS NOW !!!!!!!! GET him! Send 'Em to 'EL!
In Moores Law, everything turns out perfect!
Posted by: David MacPhee
Computer graphics is growing fast so it will replace real actors soon.they will be only contributing sample of their voice so it can be sampled that way.
Posted by: Samuel Wondemu
has anyone here seen Avatar its in movies now it is amazingly realistic and the 3.5D images are amazing i think Avatar has surpassed this already at first i thought the blue dude WAS real
Posted by: Jonn murray
Avatar
Posted by: Marie
this is a stupid idea cuz if we have animated movies then its like watching cartoons and that sucks
Posted by: diegotromplet
I think that this will be most likely for a second choice in the movies if they can't get certain actors. We would probaly outlaw it because everything would be run by robots and we would have nothing to do
Posted by: Shashank
it will happen
Posted by: scean
QUOTE: (I don't believe that CGI will totally replace human actors because movie studios are "using" real actors (through publicity) even if they're not in a movie (ads, public appearances, etc). Except that, the actor must be a human in order to became a "Star". Star means that he will have fans, etc. This is not possible with a CGI actor.
Posted by: Antonios Dimopoulos)
What about the Gorillaz? The characters used to portray the band The Gorillaz are in fact drawings and 3d characters yet most people know them in some way or another. I think making cgi characters into starts is not only a reality, but an inevitability and a massive opportunity for marketing. We can already see that in cereal comercials, cartoons, etc. CGI stars are the way to go for future marketing, the have no rights and a face the public can love, because something that isn't real couldn't possibly have anything to gain from you.
Posted by: Just thinking ahead
Really hope Twilight reads this then for Breaking Dawn they can have a realistic looking baby who walks and talks and is beautiful.
Posted by: 10101100011010
The future is here now and the better our technology gets the better the movie/entertainment industry is going to be. Tickle is just a taste of things to come.
Posted by: archieUS
Avatar was the beginning - we will see more of this.
Posted by: engelskt svenskt lexikon
this didnt help
Posted by: kasiy
Currently, celebrity is very important. What will replace it when studios are using non-real people?
Posted by: John Barefield
.It is so cool. I love this
Posted by: Deepak
The movie Tron: Legacy uses Clu, a fully animated realistic character.
Posted by: noona
The movie Tron: Legacy uses Clu, a fully animated realistic character.
Posted by: noona
People who do not think it's possible for human actors to be replaced have a very human centric view. I can see it being very possible for computers to download old movies from actors and replicate how they would play a scene. some strange movies could be made that way, Pauly Shore and John Wayne in a buddy flick?
Posted by: murphy
I'd love to see that type of movie because that'll be the next revolutionary animated movie since Toy Story pt.1 in 1995
Posted by: Jason Palacios
there is no need of animated movie at all.It 's better to see the real characters than animated one.One cant enjoy animation for long time/
Posted by: Sarwar
what about andy serkis? he is making a career for himself and the only roles i have seen hime play is Golem and the Ceaser
Posted by: sjkfljkd
4Q6FbE Say, you got a nice post.Thanks Again. Want more.
Posted by: Microsoft OEM Software
DpZLfo wow, awesome article post.Much thanks again. Great.
Posted by: Adobe OEM Software
KVKmii Looking forward to reading more. Great blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.
Posted by: Buy Cheap OEM Software
UwmOb7 Very informative post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
Posted by: Adobe OEM Software