Official number of arrests since 1st August 2005 in the SOCPA Designated Are

> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Charity Sweet"
> >To:
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:52 AM
> >Subject: Charity sweet from england...
> >
> >
> > > I WAS READING YOUR SITE, THE OTHER DAY.
> > > Today i went back to it to quote about the cabinet ministers and whoop
> >whoop
> > > whoop... where did you go and why am I banned?
> > > My name is charity sweet and I do not have a phone number due to threats
> >I
> > > am a mother of three who is fighting the paedophiles who are running
> >this
> > > world into the ground.
> > > I would rather die trying to change things than lay down and die for
> >them
> > > bastards.
> > > Charity Sweet
> > > XXX
> > > I have attached a letter I will be putting up later on today...
> > > All my love

> >From: "mghansel"

> >Reply-To: "mghansel"
> >To: "Charity Sweet" charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk>
> >Subject: Re: Charity sweet from england...
> >Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:03:46 -0700
> >
> >Hello;
> >I hear what your saying, and it getting bad here also in Canada.
> >We now have a police state mentality and CSIS wanting to cut off arms of
> >protesters, who were also threatened.
>I don't know why you couldn't read the web... We have not done anything to
> >stop people in the UK from reading the website.
> >That's really strange, that you would get the 403 webpage, as the only IP's
> >banned are government snoops using proxies, government IP's and certain
> >company's like AOL, and a couple others who give out the customers'
> >information to the government.......
> >
> >I'll have to talk to our technicians' to see what is going on or if their
> >was a security breach and run your IP service!....
>
> >Which cabinet ministers did you wish to quote....If I had there names, I
> >could sent you the material in E-mail, if that ok with you.
> >thank you

Original Message -----
From: "Charity Sweet"
To:
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: Charity sweet from england...

> Most interesting to hear from you.
> I am at Dot Cafe in Rochester when I always send my assalt letters to the
> British government. The Nova Scotia assholes already chased me out of town.
> I guess the fun are games are starting here now.
> Please google socpa charity sweet and that's me - from google uk or any
> search engine linked to the UK.
> The cafe I am at has 7 computers set up on a network and the owners son
> explained to me that they have an external IP address.
> I always sit at station 7 to prove my point and they did just that.
> Every computer in this place cannot access your site. My access is being
> filtered and fucked basically, to be blunt. Caught up in the ISP wars, I
> apparently am.
> Curiously, the same lad told me that they have been having problems with
> station 7 all week.
> I am forcing these issues into the media over here and I would appreciate
> any information that the good men there would like sang out to the world
> about the Canadian bastards who are running your fine homeland into the
> ground.
> My folks immigrated to nutty N.S. as Newlyweds and I bailed out of the
> corruption at 16.
> My dad was masonic and bought off a judge for a triple murder.
> Unfortunately, we, you and me, my friend, are on the same page.
> Please send any documents you can that need to be highlighted in the poress
> over here. I will do everything I can, to help you back home.
> I still love Canada and I love England too. WE need to unite our nations
> against this evil, yes?
> 'you can only but ask'
Charity Sweet

From : mghansel
Reply-To : "mghansel"
Sent : 13 July 2006 02:49:19
To : "Charity Sweet"
Subject : Re: Charity sweet from england...

|
|
| Inbox

Hello;

Ok, I now know you are,, sorry it didn't register, right away.
I did put up your story on the website about you protesting this nutty Uk government red zone law. It seems these scum police state thugs, like threatening people to remove their children from them, and when I say your video, I blew a gasket and wanted to punch that cop in the head. This law in the UK is really something alright, stopping people from protesting and speaking out, ("using your god given freedom of speech.")

What people in Canada don't get is that the federal government here did put out a hit list and named people and their originations in Canada who should be monitored, criminal charged, and jailed using the terrorist act. I contacted everyone on the list, and only one person who I know personally who was on the list is suing the government and so far he has won the first part... I believe the government of Canada will offer a settlement on this civil case before the courts.

Yes you are caught up in the Government(s) ISP wars were having with them right now, world wide. There a great data base that the government(s) are using, so they can be collecting names and information on people....You most likely already know the state has given billions for setting up camps in Canada, USA, for those people who don't fit into their up Utopia one world government.

The service you are using is listed on a government IP highway, not that you or the service you are using is connected to the government, but never-less is caught in the middle. We do apologize that you can't access the web, but if the government wants people names they can piss off because we are not supplying them anything. We also caught the same UK metropolitan police department that harassed you, also snooping around, so we banned them too....

One of the big issues that effect Canada is this North American Union, that the mainstream press doesn't want to talk about
just to give you an example

http://www.fathers.ca/total_control_over_canadians.htm

CANADA: "What's it's Becoming"
Mark Harrison from the CBC response on The North America Union
But the time table has moved from 2010 to 2007 now and Harper has seen to that!
Listen to the MP3 audio
- Transcribe -

(voice of) Mark Harrison, award winning Senior Producer of CBC:

MH: Hi there, it’s Mark Harrison from the CBC calling; you'd sent a note asking for a call back about why we are not doing anything on the North American Union and the NAFTA Highway. Ummm. Several years ago there was a big push to a, sort of a broader union, and it died on the, sort of on the soles of national self-interest. And I dont imagine we'll be doing more on this one until there is an indication that this will be moving forward. Ummm... and that... doesn't.... seem apparent at the moment but if there is any indication that it is moving forward and anything towards a One World Government under the United Nations we'll certainly be doing something on it but... ahhhh... we are not there yet in our opinion... ahh hh... thanks for the call. Take care. Bye now.
Lou Dobbs on the North American Union
You Tube | July 3 2006
CNN Show Host Lou Dobbs brings us a segment on the Bush administration's traitorous set-up of the North American Union. - july2006/030706loudobbs.htm
Bush Administration Fast-Tracks Formation of North American Union
Jerome R. Corsi | July 12 2006

Hello again,

I am requesting your permission to post portions of our email conversation up on the net as it makes for interesting readers to the UK audience - rather strikes a familiar chord with how England is being sacrificed to the EU and ultimately, the UN.

Is is a joke that on the night before Tony the Toad told the papers he was going Catholic and wanted to the lead the UN when he stood down from number 10... I was cautioned as a terrorist for singing a few hymns, an English standard - Monty Python 'Always look on the bright side of life' and 'You are my Sunshine'????

please email back as soon as

I am here at the Dot Cafe in Rochester. I have resorted to riding my bike everywhere now. They can get on their bikes too! I have sent a copy of this email to a mate of mine for obvious reasons. Please take no offence.

Also, could you please mail me the cabinet members involved in that scandal I briefly viewed from your site. I would like all thier names and specifically the ones who hail from the Maritimes as I believe their will be a PREVALENCE OF NONSES FROM THAT REGION IN POSITIONS OF POWER ABUSING THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN. Thank you in advance.

I read and understood completely that Canada is just a pot of frogs on a slow boil, like England, with both our idiot politicians slowly raising the boil on both our nation's national sovereignty. I understand all too well how they sneak through their agenda under the guise of 'freedom' and 'protection' and now 'transportation'. Section 132 - 137 of the socpa act.. enacted by section 138 - in complete contravention to the Human rights Act Section 10 and 11. Section 19 comes into play as well, I believe. (according to a briefing set before the House of Lords/shmucks by JUSTICE: a legal bunch of bods)

Tony is making an ass of the law and the English 'froggies' think I am a terrorist for singing out the truth??? Tony the toad is creating the opportunity (classic hegelian dialect) to create his own British Human Rights (England anyone?) or perhaps for the UN and his so-called reserved seat at the UN (fat %$^&ing chance mate!)

It's funny how his witchy Mrs. is cashing in on Human wrongs/rights being the legal sow she is, while her hubby is bombing the babies and creating the future refugees needing her brand of human wrongs/rights legal 'advice'. Don't vote for a war monger? (Best advice I can give.)

RACHAEL CORY ring any bells folks?

The British Navy has been sent to rescue who?
Tourists?
Employees?
Citizens?

For the Love of God who will rescue the Lebanese children?
For the Love of Christ, do the Palestinain children mean nothing/ are nothing? Has the world gone &^$£ing insane?

I thought the rule of the sea was women and children first?

Not tourists and employees!

Sick bastards is all I have to say! The water is getting mighty hot over here mate. And still, I could be over there...

Ciao
Charity Sweet
XXX

anticopyright acknowledging the terrorified children of Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon and wherever our bomb makers sell and kill our children - may God forgive us...

(Curiously, I haven’t had any response as of yet…)

An old friend of mine who has had legal training recently suggested to me that there may be a legal loophole in the legislation inasmuch as the sock-pa stuff (Act) talks in kilometres which are not legal tender in this country (yet, or never).

UP! With The Pints!

OR WHAT!

Dude... most interesting little fact.

The Canadians went over to metric when I was a child and then we were steared back onto Uncle Sam's way of thinking somewhat. Canada is half metric and half imperial measurements. ^%$$ed basically!

Maybe the Socpa legislation was thought up back then or in a country where metric is more standard???

%^&* knows how them bastards think. It definitely involves no logic or reasoning powers.

Idiots... fools writing rules.

Thank you for pointing out that interesting tidbit!

Charity XXX

Advanced Disclosure / Press Release
Dear Sir: S.O.S.
XXX

sir ian blair: you are The Weakest Link - goodbye!
- anti copyright
Statement of Charity Sweet: expert independent witness on corruption - Part I of 4; including the Baa Baa Baa statement for your education and reading entertainment

7896 words
my opinion/my mind/my heart/my words
Batman, get Robin... someone send out the Bat signal from London!
The Joker is loose in the Metropolis!

sir ian blair: YOU ARE the weakest link.

...GOODBYE!

Attention:

sir ian 'the Joker' blair
Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis
Scotland Yard
London, England

'super-corrupt' Superintendent ian terry "t*sser" who loves to torture peace protesters
Caring Cross Police Station
Charing Cross
London, England

c/o Caring Cross Police Station
Charing Cross
London, England
02073217711

c/o Belgravia Police Station
Where I understand there are some good men and women of honour, real 'coppers' and 'bobbies', please be an independent eye witness willing to testify in a court of law.
Belgravia
London, England

c/c:

Mr. Brian W. Haw
Parliament Square
London, England

The 'amazingingly beautiful' Barbara Tucker
Parliament Square
London, England

Queen Elizabeth II
Please bring home your army. Please return our nation's sons and daughters immediately and safely home to us. Please.
Buckingham Palace
London, England

Princess Diana's boys XXX
c/o Kensington Palace
London, England

The Independent newspaper
London, England

The Guardian newspaper
London, England

The Evening Standard newspaper
London England

The Sun Newspaper
London, England

Mr. and Mrs. Tony 'the war criminal' Blair
Hell is as long time a blazing'...
10 Downing Street
London, England

Judge Which-face
"Is this Westminster-gate?" - Mr. Brian W. Haw

"How can this court case possibly continue, your honor, when the police have stolen almost all of my evidence? How can this trial possibly continue?" - Mr. Brian W. Haw

The police have stolen the evidence and property of Brian W. Haw; notably needed for your (apparently and hopefully not) 'kangaroo' court of breaking exactly whose illegal conditions and his curious trial. He previously displayed, openly and publicly, said evidence of GENOCIDE and retained his personal legal property against the above noted JOKER and the above noted government/war criminals, for almost 5 years, until it was needed for these and other trumped up, ridiculous charges imposed by sir ian blair and somehow (clandestine dawn raid involving 78(?!) police) stolen by said policing farce, in collusion with and on the behalf of our muppet/puppet/dictator Prime Minister - Tony 'the Toad' Blair.

2 + 2 = 4 in any language. A + B = C? C'a va? Tu compris? Est-ce que tu as une mal a la tete?(sp?)

Beauty may only be skin deep and in Tony's case and in this 'law' suit against Mr. Brian W. Haw and free speech, within these duly noted 'special' circumstances - ugly is straight through to the bone! 'Abuse of process' ring any bells? Do you understand what 'advanced disclosure' means? The tainting of evidence and the event of a mistrial have both been known to occur in English law and therefore exist in reality and do apply in this case specifically. Do you need to purchase a dictionary or to borrow a book of law? The Bible perhaps?

Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not steal. - the Bible

Satan/the devil is the father of all lies in many of today's world religions while God rules the heavens and the earth. The earth does not belong to an evil bunch of liars; the earth was created for all the world's children to live in peace in a loving environment - it's not supposed to be a living hell for most children and a bed of roses for the elite few 'adults' who govern democracy unjustly. Illogical. Irrational. Unreasonable.

"How big is your brown envelope, your honor?" - Mr. Brian W. Haw and Mrs. Charity Sweet in unison.

Your Honor, please grow some English 'bollocks' and throw this 'B.S.' case out of the window and into the rubbish heap where it belongs. Please dismiss all charges against Mr. Brian W. Haw and return his personal property and legal documents immediately, accepting that a theft has taken place - no joke, whatsoever. Until the application of the conditions, let alone the justification for the conditions is argued in the High Courts of this land, punishing Mr. Brian Haw, let alone incarcerating him, is completely out of the question due to an obvious corruption and gross abuse of the legal processes.

Next...

Please CHARGE sir ian 'the JOKER' blair and the 'super-corrupt' ian terry with grand theft of artwork, collusion, corruption and the attempted murder of free speech.

A bench warrant is also demanded by the English public for Mr. and Mrs. Tony Blair and all well-known co-conspirators of war crimes against humanity. All persons to be held without bail; namely everyone who voted to bomb Iraq as a pre-emptive strike of war, against Nuremburg laws, or those who would still, to this day, defy democracy and would deny free speech, aiding and abetting SOCPA and ASBO legislation against humankind.

All assets of said criminals to be seized and sold at auction. All monies to be confiscated and returned to the English public education and healthcare coffers - and especially back to the English grannies and the old age war pensioners. All war criminals to be banished from English soil to a completely isolated, deserted island and all segregated from global societies permanently for all time. Parked up with the pedophiles of society would be a just dandy idea - a male island and a female island, both seas apart/separate and safe-guarded by the Navy.

A peaceful society would not ever allow their kind the chance to breed, ever again. The returned soldiers could help to keep them in line as I am certain would be their pleasure; to truly protect all our nation's children from the vilest creatures of society. They can grow their own food and sort themselves out. All honorable and good, men and women, deplore a pedophile and/or a lying, skeezy, wormy politically-motivated, money-oriented conniving treasonous b*stard or b*tch, as whichever the case may be.

"It's too late for two-faced apologies." - Damian Marley; Bob's boy from Jamaica, the former and present-day American slave colony.

Please show your true face and do what is right and just by democracy, courage and truth, your honor.

Please shame the devil and tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, your honor, as you are sworn to God, on the Bible, to the people and paid by said people to uphold the rights of the children and the people above and place them firmly before the interests of the government and big business - the greedy and the few.

Westminster Magistrates Court
Westminster
London, England

ken livingstone
As Mayor, please speak out for the people of this great city of London. Please speak up for peace and free speech. Please.
* All note: please make sure everyone listed receives advanced disclosure of this statement.
Mayor of London
London, England

The War Crimes Division of Scotland Yard
Knock, Knock.
Is there anyone there, please? Can you help, please? Please?
Scotland Yard
London, England

Royal High Courts of Justice
London, England

The Home Office
Westminster
London, England

The House of Lords
Westminster
London, England

The Houses of Parliament
Westminster
London, England

District Judge Evans
Horseferry Road Magistrates Courts
a.k.a Westminster Magistrates Courts
Westminster
London, England

The 'vulgar' DpG – The Diplomatic 'plastic' Protection Group
Westminster
London, England

The 'crooked' cPs – The Crown Prosecution Service/persecution system
Westminster
London, England
September 6th, 2006

Dear Sir:

S.O.S.

I believe the first thing I need to do is to clearly define some words in my own mind. That would be a good place to start when attempting to decipher the murky world of "anti-terrorist" law and the world of Blair and Blair - the naughty pair - the lepers of London and civil liberties or should I say... the liberators of civil disabilities as may be a more politically correct way of approaching the matter. Definitions are a must when approaching the law. Apparently, the first definition of the 'crappy' Oxford Dictionary, which has eliminated the noun 'free speech' from its concise tenth (hard cover) edition contents hence defecating on the English language and democracy herself, is the rule of thumb where Tony's modern, new and improved English law is concerned. (That was a mouthful!)

Words are very important in my mind. I recently purchased a white t-shirt with three words on it that has received a few comments from society. It started a rather interesting lengthy conversation the other day. The conversation began, "What does that mean?” I replied that it is a rather impolite way of saying, "Hell No!"

I thought it was just a North American colloquialism. I was informed that the English understand where this Canadian transplant, with her English roots, is 'coming from'.

£2.99 Oxford everyday dictionary - old small paperback - containing a definition of 'free speech'

colloquialism: noun a colloquial word or phrase

colloquial: adjective (said about a word or piece of language) suitable for ordinary conversation but not for formal speech or writing

That's odd. I always assumed that colloquial meant a phrase pertaining and relevant to/understood mainly within a certain geographical area and associated within a region of people with a common language; is generally slang as opposed to grammatically correct. 'Monkey see, monkey do', as an example.

The three monkeys posed in a sculpture generally is recognized everywhere as it artistically depicts the combined words and saying 'Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil' with three individual monkeys sitting collectively, side by side. Each little monkey has both of their hands placed over their ears, eyes, and mouth respectively. An assumed meaning behind these three little dudes could be that if you don't hear about evil and you don't see it and you don't speak about it - you won't know about it; in essence; evil won't exist. If no little monkey talks about evil at all and no one sees it and no ones hears about 'it', how could 'it' possibly exist? Quantum physics clearly states that things must be observed and quantified in order to be perceived as part of reality.

exist: verb 1. to be present as a part of what is real

real: adj. 1. actually existing, not imaginary 2. actual or true 3. genuine, not imitation

imaginary: adj. existing only in the imagination, not real... unreal, fanciful fictitious, invented

imitation: adj. 2. something produced by copying or imitating something from a Latin word imitari meaning 'to copy'

You could make another assumption of meaning behind the three monkeys. All knowledge of evil could be eradicated by simply completely ignoring evil and refusing it to be allowed to be imitated in any given way. If it can't be seen or heard or spoken about, the assumption one is left with is a non-existence of evil which seems highly unlikely given today’s over-sexualized greedy mentality of most warmongering nations involved in weapons trading. Or, it could artistically depict that once these three little monkeys heard what they heard and saw what they saw, they said what needed to be said and the evil wasn't tolerated anymore. Art is like poetry, it inspires differing meanings in different people. Words can be very artistic, by nature - they paint a picture.

The phrase on my t-shirt is, "DO I FCUK". It is a French Connection U.K. brand t-shirt. There is no question mark at the end of the statement. While it appears to be a question, there is only a grammatical reference to a question of thought in the use of the word 'do'. Do I swim? Do I bike? Do I love my children? Do you read? These are all phrases that raise a question mark at the end of each thought expressed in a questioning format, complete with the proper punctuation mark needed - a question mark.

We all know that the logo FCUK is a cheeky way of printing the "F" word from the English language which is pretty much globally understood to be the word 'f*ck'(replacing the * with the vowel 'u'. It is a slang word and a dirty word, as I was taught by my mother. As an adult, I now understand it to be a colloquial word. It was generally known in society as a foul word and not acceptable to be said within the public media; i.e. television or radio. It is certainly not acceptable to be used within a court of law or legal documents when addressing members of the legal community unless quoting the words of a statement given by an individual. You could quite rightly get arrested by an officer of the law in many countries, whether it is in its English form or whatever translation of language, when combined with the threee letter word 'off'. Now I am being cheeky.

Where I come from in Eastern Canada, the Maritime Provinces to be specific, we use the phrase "Do I f*ck!" as an exclamatory remark of disgust and objection to an unreasonable question, especially when the question is of an insulting nature. If I were to take personal affront to a man asking me a ridiculous question that insulted my intelligence say...

"Do you have permission to" sing a song?

"Do I f*ck!" I thought in my mind.

Did a police officer of the Diplomatic detachment of the Police of the Metropolis of London threaten, once again, to have me arrested and therefore separated from my child, interrupting me from singing a song, "You are my sunshine", to my youngest daughter, for an 'offence' that is only reportable and not arrestable by definitions contains within SOCPA legislation? Was he abusing his powers and the laws of justice? Did someone ask him to approach, abuse the law - question, bully and threaten me? Was it on sir ian's behalf or am I being completely paranoid? Do I need permission to sing a song in public areas, specifically outside - exterior to any public or privately owned building, in a free and democratic society, providing no foul language is used? "Do I f*ck!"

'Hell no!' is a more polite response within the accepted morality of general society than the above noted phrase and yet still wouldn't be regarded as a remotely polite response within a court of law. The response "Hell no" would have certainly gotten me arrested last Thursday afternoon. I simply exerted my knowledge of the SOCPA Act and clearly stated that Joe Coppo was abusing the SOCPA legislation and his assumed position of power over my freedom of speech. I carried on singing, as usual. He said goodbye and toodled back to his position behind the gates.

Do I need a courts permission to wear a t-shirt that bears a logo outside a courtroom? "Hell no!" Inside a courtroom, I would assume that a FCUK t-shirt would not be deemed appropriate attire by any persons sitting in judgment of those individuals accused of crimes.

"DO I FCUK" - French Connection U.K.

There is little opposition to Capitalism and the wearing of branded items of clothes within a Capitalistic society, which may be by their artistic expression, offensive in nature.

Here is hoping we are all 'on the same page'; another colloquialism that delivers the assumption that should we all be reading the same book by the same author, we have all read up to the same page in said book and have therefore read the same information and have a shared understanding of the grouped meanings of these words - a common knowledge.

'Ask a stupid question - get a stupid answer' is another good saying. Is a saying is a colloquialism?

saying: noun a well known phrase or proverb

The correct response to the question of whether a saying is a colloquialism is - possibly yes, possibly no. The words that combine to make a ‘saying’ are also known as phrases. Certain phrases, certain people use, generally, in certain geographical areas. The question of colloquialism depends not where the saying originates from but whether the phrase is suitable for formal speech or writing.” Is it f*ck!" is a variation of "Do I f*ck!” both are sayings and colloquialisms - not suitable for formal speech and writing.

formal: adj. 1. strictly following the accepted rules or custom 2. following a set structure or form

Providing a phrase is suitably in line with the accepted rules and customs of a democratic society, is a phrase just a phrase or is it a security risk? Given a phrase is not suitable to be expressed in public due to the use of foul language and/or that it would be found to be offensive to the majority of said public, i.e. racial slurs, is the verbal expression of certain phrasings that incite hatred towards a specific segment of society an arrestable offence?

The phrase 'Ask a stupid question - get a stupid answer' is acceptable in public and might not be in a formal setting and therefore, by accepted definition, is possibly a colloquialism depending upon whether respect is an accepted formal standard. I would assume the correct grammatical expression of that phrase as an assumption and a complete sentence would be, "If you ask a stupid question of a person, you will receive a stupid answer in response." Ask a stupid question - get a stupid answer.", is a shortened version and is grammatically correct and I do not believe it is acceptable at a formal level of society as formal or proper English due to the implied cheekiness and lack of respect that specific statement creates. The saying implies that only stupid people ask stupid questions and therefore deserve stupid responses.

proper: adj. 3. according to social convention, respectable

respectable: adj. 1. honest and decent; of good social standing

decent: adj. 1. conforming to the accepted standards of what is moral or proper, not immodest or obscene

immodest: adj. not modest, indecent

indecent: adj. offending against generally accepted standards of decency
obscene: adj. indecent in a very offensive way. synonyms: indecent, pornographic, coarse, filthy, dirty, vulgar, and smutty

offense: noun 1. breaking the law, an illegal act

offensive: adj. 1. causing offence 2. disgusting or repulsive
offensive: noun a forceful attack or campaign

disgust: noun a strong feeling of dislike or revulsion

repulsive: adj. 1. disgusting... revolting, repugnant, repellant, vile, hideous, loathsome, obnoxious

pornography: noun pictures or descriptions that are intended to stimulate sexual excitement

pornographic: adj from a Greek word porne meaning 'prostitute' and graphy from a Greek word graphia meaning 'writing'

f*ck: not to be found in my old paperback Oxford everyday dictionary... perhaps because the word is pornographic and obscene and the noun 'free speech' was still defined?

Concise tenth edition Oxford dictionary - hardback - lacking a definition of 'free speech'

"fuck: vulgar slang verb 1. have sexual intercourse with" ... loads of definitions and phrasings offered... of Germanic origin - 16th century

£2.99 Oxford everyday dictionary - old small paperback - containing 'free speech'

vulgar: adj. 1. lacking refinement or good taste 2. rude or coarse 3. (old use) to do with or used by ordinary people

rude: adj. 2. indecent or vulgar 3. roughly made, not sophisticated

ordinary: adj. usual or normal, not special... commonplace

sophisticated: adj. 1. having refined or cultured tastes or experienced about the world 2. complex or elaborate 3. able to understand complex issues

Getting back to my French Connection U.K. t-shirt... by definition f*ck is a pornographic vulgar word. 'F*ck off' is a colloquialism that would not be acceptable in a court of law or as a response to an officer of the law. 'F*ck you' as a phrase could and would have the ability to insult pretty much anybody who understands the meaning of the saying. 'Do I f*ck' as a phrase, a verbal statement of response and a colloquialism is most probably an arrestable offence in England, when spoken directly towards an officer of the law.

I do not believe society accepts men who are supposed to be respected within our society for their roles as protectors of society to be sworn at. I am certain it must be an arrestable offence; regardless that I have been informed by Inspector Lyons of the Charing Cross division of the Metropolitan police that a man who thumps an officer will serve very little time, if any. He also told me he teaches his children that it is a hard, cruel world during a conversation in which I attempted to report an assault committed against Steve Jago at the gates to 10 Downing Street, by an officer of his police station, Charing Cross, witnessed by myself and my two children and many other independent witnesses at the gates of number 10 Downing Street and clearly filmed by an independent member of the 'news' media. (can be found on the internet on the indymedia UK site - thank you rikki for your talent of always being at the right place at the right time and for your anti-capitalist spellings and reporting of the real news from London, without political bias.)

Opposed to Inspector Lyons, I teach my youngest daughter the names of flowers, her times tables, respect and the value of honesty. She sees the corruption of the beauty of nature, the value of knowledge and the kindness respect regenerates, for herself.

respect: noun 1. admiration felt towards a person or thing that has good qualities or achievements

respect verb 1. to feel or show respect for a person or thing... admire, revere, look up to 2. agree to abide by a rule, agreement etc.

good: adj. having the right or desirable properties, satisfactory 2. appropriate or suitable 3. morally correct virtuous 4. strictly following the principles of a religion or cause 5. kind 6. well behaved

bad: adj. of poor quality or a low standard 2. unpleasant or upsetting 3. serious or severe 4. wicked or evil... immoral, corrupt villainous, sinful

F*ck is not a good word - it is a bad word. I think that is what we still teach the children at school. I do not believe the children are permitted to swear at their teachers and are generally reprimanded and/or punished for the use of foul language towards a person within society who is employed to educate. I do not believe swearing is tolerated within most daycares of the infants of today's Capitalist society. Doesn't Pete of Big Brother fame have issues and perhaps mainly a disease associated with the inability to control his outward expression of inappropriate words which sometimes includes 'swear' words?
swear word: noun a word considered offensive or obscene

Which brings me back to...

free speech : noun the right to express your opinions

... and democracy.

democracy: noun 1. government of a country by representatives elected by the whole people 2. a country governed in this way from a Greek word demos meaning 'the people' and cracy from a Greek word kratia meaning 'rule'

demonstration: noun 1. demonstrating 2. a show of feeling 3. an organized gathering or march held to express the opinion of a group publicly

demonstrate: verb 1. to show evidence of something, to prove it

demonstrative: adj. 1. showing or proving something 2. expressing your feelings openly

Concise tenth edition Oxford dictionary - hardback - lacking a definition of 'free speech'

demonstrate: 1. clearly show the existence or truth of - give a practical exhibition and explanation of 2. take part in a public demonstration; 16th century from the Latin verb

demonstrat, demonstrare meaning to 'point out'

demon(1):noun 1. an evil spirit or a devil

demon(2):noun a police officer (Australia, New Zealand), 19th century apparently from Van Diemen's Land, an early name for Tasmania

SOCPA - the Serious Organized Criminal Protection Agency or is it...
The Serious Organized Crime Prevention Act... I am uncertain.

Section 134 - The Authorization of Demonstrations within the Designated Area - which curiously happens to also be the main area of central London containing the tourist sites most tourists are likely to visit and most London tourist buses are likely to cruise by, if not stop at... ironic. Harks me back to the Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A., when the 'state' cleared the city of all vagrants, issuing one way bus passes so as to put forward a pleasant 'bum'-less society to the visiting nationals. WTF?

Sub section 3. conditions may be imposed and specified in the authorization relating to a demonstration which are necessary to prevent the following in the

COMMISSIONER'S r.e.a.s.o.n.a.b.l.e. OPINION... yada, yada, yada. This statement implies that the Commissioner is the only person who may authorize and the only person who may impose specified conditions and that his opinion is reasonable. In order to have a reasonable opinion, one would have to demonstrate a reasonable mind through reasonable actions which is simply not the case. sir ian blair has shown himself to consistently be the JOKER of the Metropolis of London in his curtailing of 'free speech' - the right to express opinions publicly. He has consistently shown and proven himself to be a most unreasonable excuse for an English officer of the law and a poor example of a 'male' member of the human species.

Conditions may be applied should there be r.e.a.s.o.n.a.b.l.e. cause to assume it would be necessary to prevent:

a) hindrance to the entrance of parliamentary buildings. The 5 year longstanding protest of Brian Haw of Parliament Square provided absolutely no hindrance to the entrance of Parliament on any occasion, at any given point in the past 5 years (1825 days, 43,800 hours, or 2,628,000 minutes) and yet was limited to three meters in length and one meter in width? Who are the individuals who believe they have the right to limit the amount of evidence of GENOCIDE displayed to the public? Is limiting evidence reasonable? I understand that metric is not the accepted term of measurement used in the English Court rooms; I could be mistaken. I believe all the road signs in England limiting speed are designated in miles per hour and all speeding tickets are given out in miles over the speed limit. Has any other demonstration been met with such brutal limiting forces? The pot smokers had as much space as they liked and were free to smoke their weed. Is there only a limit to the amount of evidence of genocide that may be presented to the public?

Reasonable or irrational?

irrationalism: noun a system of belief or action that disregards rational principles

b) a hindrance to the proper operation of parliament. Once again, over a 5 year period, Mr. Brian W. Haw has never stopped parliament from carrying on willy-nilly, exactly as they pleased, despite the Nuremburg laws of 1945 that clearly state, as valiantly noted in the courtrooms of this land by Chris Coverdale, and define genocide as a war crime as well as pre-emptive strikes of war by any democratic government. Both activities are illegal in relation to the laws of England and both war crimes are treasonous to the nation thereof. When reporting a crime, as is every citizen’s duty, under said Nuremburg laws, is it reasonable for an official of the law to ask the reporter of said crime as to whether or not he has applied for permission to report said crime? Permission is required to report a crime? In ian and Tony's world, is reporting a crime without permission from the perpetuator of the crime a crime in itself and can it be perceived as a demonstration of 'free speech' - another crime? Is that a reasonable question I just wrote or does it sound completely farcical and
illogical? Reasonable?

c) serious public disorder

£2.99 Oxford everyday dictionary - old small paperback - containing 'free speech'

disorder: noun 1. lack of order; untidiness or confusion 2. a riot 3. an illness

serious: adj. 4. causing great concern, not slight

c)(cont'd) Is the public the slightest bit concerned regarding the relatively few people of this nation exercising their right to free speech? Is it a crime to confuse someone - create a little confusion in their mind? Isn't that what politicians and propaganda spin doctors do every day in one country or another, utilizing the generally monopolized 'news' media as a weapon of propaganda, somewhere in the world? Is this where democracy has come to? Politicians can blatantly lie though their teeth and Steve Jago may not hold up a board with a few quotes from George Orwell lest he be illegally detained on trumped up charges of assault against an officer of the Metropolis after he, himself was assaulted by an officer of the Metropolis of London? Reasonable?

"In times of universal deceit it is a treasonous act to speak the truth." - George Orwell

Barbara Tucker could not possibly be conceived to cause a riot simply by wearing a pink sparkly banner declaring "peace love and justice for all". Is her pink banner a threat to public order? Does Barbara Tucker pose a serious public threat to the order of the public? Is that a reasonable question to ask? How many times has Barbara Tucker, Steve Jago or Brian Haw been victimized and bullied by various officers of the law? (Babs - 59 times I believe). Is that a reasonable question to ask of a democratic society? Has sir ian blair ever accepted or admitted that an application to protest has been received, by himself, from Barbara Tucker, despite numerous court hearings and wasting of public funds; despite numerous emails and legal letters that have been exchanged through umpteen hands? Is that reasonable and is sir ian demonstrating his ability, or lack thereof, to reason reality from his own imaginary world?
Brian Haw has resided at Parliament Square day and night for over five years, just across from street from where Tony and the boys have eroded over 1000 years of law, there not being one terrorist incident at said location nor any assaults or acts of violence, except by officers of law against peaceful protesters. Is that a reasonable statement, a statement fact, a statement or a statement of fiction. Who is behaving sanely and whom are the lunatics? War does not bring peace; It just sells more weapons, makes more money, kills more children and brings more wars.

d) danger to property. The only property that has been damaged is that of the people which was gifted to Brian Haw and damaged by agents under direct orders from sir ian 'woof woof' blair. I would ask of the artist Mr. Banks as to whether he believes his gifted artwork, valued at some £50,000, was treated in a fair and reasonable fashion when it was removed carelessly, to say the least, in a clandestine early morning raid on 'free speech' that could only be perpetuated by the Joker himself. Is this a reasonable way to go about enforcing limitations to freedom of expression and/or speech as allowed for under the Human Rights Act, Article 10 and/or 11, I believe? Reasonable? Logical?

logical: adj. to do with or according to logic

logic: noun 1. the science of reasoning 2. a particular system or method of reason 3. a chain of reasoning regarded as good or bad

e) a disruption to the life of the community.

community: noun 1. the people living in one place or country and considered as a whole 2. a group with similar interests or origins 3. the state of having interests in common

e)(cont'd) I will assert that working in the community is not the same as living in the community by definition of each and every word of that statement. I will again assert that Maria and

Brian lives at Parliament Square as Brian Haw 's address is recognized by the Royal Courts of Justice to be Parliament Square. Maria is also known to the Metropolitan Police as residing at Parliament Square. On occasion, various other individual have made a conscious choice to live at Parliament Square for periods of time and have been recorded by several CCTv cameras as doing exactly that.

I would assert that the community must only be treated as a whole without neglecting one individual who abides within the 'designated area' specifically including peaceful protesters. Lastly I would assert that bullying tactics of a broad range have been used against a small segment of said community under the direct orders of sir ian, a.k.a. the JOKER or Tony Blair's political lap dog. I will assert that the only disruptive force within said community are the actors of this political police farce - notably the Charing Cross branch who have been known to have behaved in an deplorable fashion, in the past; curiously and specifically since the introduction of SOCPA. I would question whether bullying is a reasonable tactic for an officer of the law towards a peaceful member of society and the community. I question whether the Senior Officer of the Police of the Metropolis of London is reasonable to tolerate and condone bullying.

BULLYING: verb to use strength or power to hurt or frighten a weaker person... threaten, intimidate, coerce, domineer, tyrannize

BULLY: noun a person who tries to hurt or frighten people who are weaker

POWER: noun 1, strength or energy 2. the ability to do something

... to do something i.e. 1. illegally arrest a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable offence and only a reportable offence (Cuba? Russia? China? England? - dictatorships?) 2. illegally threaten to arrest a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable offence and only a reportable offence a.k.a. a breach of the peace - to incite fear - an arrestable offence 3. illegally physically threaten and/or physically harm a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable offence and only a reportable offence a.k.a. assault, actual bodily harm, grievous bodily harm - all arrestable offences 4. illegally arrest and detain a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable offence and only a reportable offence for any indeterminate amount of time a.k.a. kidnapping - an arrestable offence. Reasonable?

f) security risk.

security: noun 1. a state or feeling of being secure

secure: adj. 1. safe, especially against attack from a Latin word securus meaning 'free from worry', from se meaning 'apart' and cura meaning 'care'

f)(cont'd) In a democracy, is a verbal attack reasonable? Threatening someone verbally in order to cause or instigate fear is not a reasonable act in a safe democratic society.

Threatening to physically harm someone through dialogue is not reasonable in a safe and secure environment. Is accusing the government of a war crime considered a reasonable verbal attack? Is a reasonable display of evidence in the pictorial form known as photography and/or illustrated through artwork on canvass a security risk?

Did Maya Evans not grieve on queue at the appointed hour and minute as stated by the government as a time to grieve and therefore was her statement of the dead soldiers of this illegal war a security risk?

Is it reasonable for me to witness a gaggle of female cHARING cROSS police officers drive off only one group of several VISITING tourists, from Parliament Square, who sat peacefully and filmed Parliament and the tower that contains the bell, little known to many, named Big Ben. Please correct me if I am wrong.

When I have seen so many groups film parliament at various times of the twenty-four hour solar cycle, is citing the area as a "high security risk" a reasonable explanation for rude behavior, bullying tactics and general poor form as officers of the policing community? Was it reasonable of me to assume that their only crime was that they were black and were obviously, to myself, Moslem? Did I really witness a hate crime of a racist nature on behalf of those cows on bikes against peaceful tourists - a visiting sector and representatives of another community? Is institutional racism reasonable? Is it reasonable to assume that bullying a race or a religion goes against the laws of this multi-cultural society Tony Blair has for sale?

I met two famous comedians last Thursday. One was Mark Thomas from England and the other was from the Sudan, Africa. I don't find the Joker that heads the Met funny in the least. Are 'free speech' and/or the wearing of clothing recognized as an ethnic dress code and/or religious expression in attire truly a security risk in a democratic society? If sir ian blair truly believes the act of expressing the God given right of free speech is a security risk, is he a reasonable man? If so, I assert the man has 'lost his marbles', and I use the term 'man' loosely, regardless.

g) a risk to the public.

risk: noun 1. a situation involving the chance of suffering injury or loss 2. the possibility that something unpleasant will happen

risk: verb 1. to expose something to the chance of injury or loss

g)(cont'd) Is it reasonable to assume that someone will get hurt at the hands of a verbal assault - the most unpleasant angle of free speech? Can sticks and stones really break your bones? Yes... and bombs are made for certain destruction of human life. Will name calling ever really truly physically hurt someone or place them at risk of physical injury? Possibly, should the situation out of hand into physical violence. i.e. the behavior of some members of the Charing Cross Police station, not all.

Could the public loose something by being offered the opinions of its members of the community? Their ignorance, perhaps?

Are the presences of any group of individuals who obviously share a common bond to the naked eye a security risk or a risk to the public?

Have the reasoning abilities of sir ian blair, or lack thereof, ever been demonstrated to be, in the present or in the past, of a reasonable nature therefore indicating his capacity to hold a reasonable opinion ? I think not.

reasonable:adj. 1. fair and sensible 2. in accordance with reason, not absurd.

reason: noun 1. a cause, explanation or justification for something 2. the ability to think, understand, and draw conclusions 3. person's sanity 4. good sense or judgement;

common sense

absurd: adj. having little sense, ridiculous or foolish... silly laughable, ludicrous, preposterous, nonsensical; from a Latin word absurdus meaning 'out of tune'

pervert: verb to turn something from its proper course or use 2. to cause someone to behave wickedly or abnormally

I BELIEVE sir ian blair IS COLLUDING WITH tony blair, TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY; ABUSING SOCPA LEGISLATION, demolishing the what should be clearly defined lines between police and politics (lest we become a police state, God forbid!) AND INSULTING THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE ENGLISH PUBLIC THROUGH THEIR CLEAR DEMONSTRATION OF A LACK OF ABILITY TO REASON REALITY FROM THE IMAGINARY PERCIEVED THREATS OF TERRORISM CONCIEVED WITHIN THEIR OWN DIMENTED PSYCHES.

pervert: noun a person whose sexual behavior is thought to be abnormal or disgusting.

PERVERTS ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS OF SOCIETY: ALL PAEDOPHILES MUST immediately BE CLASSED AS DANGEROUS OFFENDERS - SEPARATE AND DISTINCT FROM THOSE WHO COMMIT MURDER AND MANSLAUGHTER; PERMANENTLY ISOLATED FROM ALL SOCIETIES CHILDREN and ALL SOCIETY FOR ALL TIME.

Do I need permission to have an opinion and to speak my mind or to sing a song?

"DO I FCUK" - French Connection U.K.

sir ian blair: do you exercise your free speech, power and authority regularly and freely or are you someone's pet monkey trained to dance on queue?
one ringy-dingy... two ringy-dingy...

tony... pick up the phone you soul-less monster. I do not approve of your war-mongering in this day and age, in this country or any other for that matter. War Kills Children.

Weapons are an evil abuse of the tax paying public funds While old English folks starve and freeze to death, you are too busy annihilating the social healthcare system for your 'Blue Cross' insurance buddies from over yonder pond to take any care and pay any attention to what is happening in your own country of origin - you simpleton. You stupidly are dumbing down the ordinary Joe Public's children's education system; pissing on democracy and what so many honorable men, women and children gave up their lives to protect - FREEDOM from ignorance and LIBERTY to be at peace. And you have the nerve to set how many 'nonses' free into the communities to molest our children again and again and again? You help protect the rights of those evil bastards over the rights of our children while you send our soldiers to kill other people's children - intentionally? Kiss my ass you evil, intolerant, arrogant, ignorant, phony, war-mongering, despicable sack of shite.

- Charity Sweet:

"stop inventing crimes and admit your own" on a plain white otherwise blank illegal placard

- anonymous author/artist of said placard, photographed physically supporting, as a lone individual, said placard above the sometimes green grass of Parliament Square in opposition to SOCPA and Tony Blair, its author; in unity and solidarity with Mark Thomas and Brian Haw and many, many other like-minded individuals as an expression of free speech and democracy in action and art.

sir ian blair on Barbara Tucker and her peaceful message of peace, love and justice for all - "Me thinks the lady doth protest too much."

- Harry: a kind representative and shining example of the witty, intelligent youth of England; a protester for peace

Sincerely,

Charity Sweet

'wake up and smell the coffee'

anti copyright Charity Sweet acknowledging Brian W. Haw, Parliament Square, John Catt, Mark Thomas, Ziggy Abu and FCUK - all equally, greatly inspire free speech

www.howtobeanarmsdealer.com

N.B. It has been suggested to me that Broadmoor Prison would be a most appropriate secure location for Prime Minister Tony Blair should he feel there is a 'serious risk' posed to his security by some very peaceful and intelligent members of the community of London - members of the pacifist community a.k.a peace protesters; commonly known for their creative, peaceful tactics as well as being the lifeblood of any democratic society/community; specifically, those who permanently or temporarily reside within the 'designated area' assumed by said quasi-democratic government to be of a 'high security risk' to Mr. Tony Blair: the chief quasi-honest 'Nazi' leader in command of English 'pseudo-democracy', himself.

All hale fuhrer Tony! Hail Blair!

Kiss my ass once again, Tony.

I am not politically correct nor politically corrupt.

Word Wars you want? It's like having a battle of wits with the witless, you asinine fool. Without your corrupt 'nonse' judges on the bench and your 'politically corrupted' henchmen police... where would you be? Broadmoor, if not The Hague.

More the fool you... there are still good judges, good police officers, good reporters and good people in this great nation of England, despite your globalized efforts to corrupt society. Long live the English pound note! Stuff the EU, globalization and the New World Order - a one world system of completely corrupted 'nonse'nsical, irrational, illogically perverted government!

May HP sauce always be made on England's shores, not in America; no disrespect intended to the citizens of the U.S.A - definitely disrespecting your politicians as my own. Inevitably, Tony, you and your cronies will be the ass of English society for making an ass of English law.

Want some good advice? Stay away from da' cocaine - it gives folks irrelevant, inconsequential, false feelings of grandeur.

consequent: adj. happening as a result

consequence: noun 1. something that happens as a result of some event or action 2. importance; to take the consequences to accept the results of your choice or action from a Latin word consequi to 'follow closely'

hypocrite: noun a person who pretends to be more virtuous than he or she really is; from a Greek word meaning 'acting a part'

hypocrisy: noun falsely pretending to be virtuous

- Tony: F*CK you, your minions, and Bushy Boy from across the pond too.

virtuous: adj. having or showing moral virtue; good, moral, noble, righteous, upright

- God save the peace! S.O.S. Save our souls - please.

Ain't free speech a beautiful thang?

My baby girl received, yesterday, the Head Teacher's Award - a certificate and a medal for "Fantastic improvement in literacy and numeracy." How happy a mummy am I? Ballet starts soon... yippee! And my boy is going to boxing tonight for the first time. His grand father won many trophies in the British Royal Navy; for that and cross country running. I have already been told that his left foot and he are "rare as rocking horse shit" by a coach from Charlton, when he was just nine years old. I take pride in raising my children - my family. The world must change for the better, for them and for all the world's children.

There can be no doubt - change is the one thing that cannot be stopped. The sun raises its head to a new dawn every single day you are blessed enough to open your eyes and take a breath. What you do with that day belies where you lay your priorities and where your heart stands. I personally believe peace and free speech are worth demonstrating to the public and the politicians as worthwhile priceless gifts from the past, for the future. That's why today is called the present - it's a gift. It should never be allowed to be stolen from any child of any nation. Gifts were meant to be given.

Blair and Blair, the naughty pair, need to admit they are responsible for the theft of many, many priceless gifts given to Mr. Brian Haw and the world from the children and parents of the world, for his strength of mind and courage of heart, in aid of peace and justice for all humankind.

What I and what we, as peace protesters, do is for the children and the future, from the charity of our hearts, as my mum taught me to do and she was always right; not for gold and silver, acclaim and/or brown envelopes.

"I don't care was made to care and all the people who followed"

- my mum; as taught to me as was taught to her, by her mum

"Who took all Brian's stuff, mummy?" - my daughter

"The police." - me

"Why did the police steal all Brian's stuff mummy? That was naughty."

- my seven year old daughter. She saw how large the display of evidence had become the day before the dawn raid in which it was illegally taken and this was her first comment to me, the next day, when approaching Parliament square from some twenty to thirty feet away. She knows right from wrong. Do you?

Forever seeking that story of "The 100th Monkey" of kindness within the reality of the psyche of all humanity - Peace to everyone, everywhere, always. And the world... could be a better place...

- a mom and member of humankind

Kindest Regards,

Charity Sweet
XXX

anti copyright Charity Sweet acknowledging the persistent efforts of Princess Diana Spencer, Steve, Babs, Chris, Maya, Mark, rikki, Eric, 'Mary Poppins' of Parliament Square, Maria and Brian and many more enlightened reasonable logical minds

The Baa, Baa, Baa Statement
anti copyright Charity Sweet

1032 words
Baa, Baa, Baa: Tony’s Liberal Sheep

News Item: All Cabinet Sheep MUST support “genocide” in the political barnyard. Baa, Baa, Baa.

Some years ago on the Happy Farm in the land of the political cronies we have seen some political sheep follow their master, the political sheep-herder, into supporting ‘genocide’. It would have been a sight to behold; these woolly headed Cabinet Ministers all Baa, Baa, Baaing on cue when their shepherd and political ewe ram herds them all in the direction of the barnyard NONSEnse; watching them rise from their sheepish positions and bleating Baa, Baa, Baa, which means YES, YES, YES in Liberal lingo, to this deviation of law called ‘genocide.’

Hear them bleat: “We’re Liberal sheep and we can bleat, and you know where to find us. Following Tony, your pal - our crony, leaving our principles behind us.” This is a true Baa Baaing statement. The Liberal sheep, having no principles, just followed their sheep-herder as the sheep are fed, watered and housed in the ‘well guarded’ Happy Farm Houses. Some of the sheep have been there for years and have no desire to lose any of their feedstuffs and perks at the political trough. You see, ‘good’ sheep always follow their master’s voice. Baa, Baa, Baa. The political shepherd and his political lap police dog lead the way for the sheep to follow.

“WOOF, WOOF, WOOF!” barked Sir Ian Blair, the political lap police dog as he sent 78 British bull terriers to remove ‘free speech’ and all traces of ‘genocide’ from the SQUARE. “We must protect the ‘rights’ of those who are different from us sheep. We are a ‘non-discriminatory’ and ‘tolerant’ Funny Farm of ‘equality’, subject to the invented Barnyard rules of our Charter.”

Baa, Baa, Baa bleat the Liberal cabinet sheep in unison. Then they will all sing in bleating sheep language, “We’re Liberal sheep with no Bo Peep and we don’t know where to find her. But we’ll follow the Blair’s, the naughty pair, we’ll vote yes - we don’t need a reminder.” Hey, a nice tune from a bleating good herd.

A few years before that song and dance, on another Funny Farm where everyone is ‘Lordly’ and small ‘c’ conservative, those sheep had voted against lowering the legal age of sexual consent for homosexual males. In fact,,, three times the ‘Lordly c’ Farm said, “NO!” to the Happy Farm Houses. The ‘c’ sheep had no intention of changing this accepted ‘normal’ age of consent for homosexual males. But many of Tony’s cronies, were going Baa, Baa, Baa in support of this perversion of the ‘law’. And so, it came to be, Tony and his barnyard buddies invoked their very first Act of Parliament, effectively over-riding the ‘c’ sheep, and lowered the legal male/male age of sexual consent. Now that’s Baa Baa Baarking mad!

Tony says it’s all about ‘freedom’ and ‘security’. Funny Farm watcher’s have wondered if mad ‘Cow’ disease has infected the Blair’s and most of the other sheep for this sheepish behavior. Some humane animals are worried that perhaps these political sheep have swallowed their own sheep dip, resulting in a poisoning of their minds.

At one point, even the QUEEN BEE, had to remind Tony that the Army Ants were ‘hers’ and not ‘his’ - no ‘his and hers’ allowed. Could there be an explanation for this mind madness in the sheep? Rumor has it; there is a worry of mad ‘Cow’ disease in the Happy Farm Houses. A recent news headline said: “Mad Cow Disease found in German goat.” (NAZIsm?/HITLER? Ringing any bells folks?) Which raised the question: Did the German ‘goat’ interfere with the English ‘Cow’, and if this happened, could Liberal sheep get infected as well?

These are strange times on the Funny Farm, indeed. Still, this mad ‘Cow’ disease should be very worrying to the Liberal sheep. If this disease could jump from a ‘goat’, it could jump to a sheep as well. And wouldn’t that be ‘goat’-awful. (Hey, isn’t that an awful pun?) But here’s hoping no German ‘goats’ have infiltrated the Happy Farm Houses. Certainly, our Liberal sheep are acting very strangely. It would appear they are unable to think for themselves anymore. Their shepherd has trained them to stand up on their hind legs and show their support for ‘genocide’. Are they again planning to be Baa, Baa, Baaing YES to this in sheepish language denying ‘free speech’? Their shepherd says no sheep exemptions allowed.

Could mad ‘Cow’ disease have infected these cabinet sheep? Is their a German ‘goat’ loose in the Happy Farm Houses and chasing the sheep? If so, could the ‘goat’ be charged for sheep interference? Could this be an animal ‘hate crime’? Mad ‘Cow’ symptoms do attack the brain and can cause unnatural behavior to the thought processes. Does this mean the Happy Farm Houses across from the SQUARE will need to be QUARANTINED?

This is a very worrying situation for the inhabitants of the Funny Farm currently governed by the Happy Farm Houses. Who will run the Happy Farm if all the cabinet sheep are QUARANTINED? Would some other Liberal turkeys take charge? Is this ‘1984’ or 2006? Is this England or ‘Animal Farm’? These are important questions that need answers.

Hopefully, Tony, the ‘master political sheep-herder’, will hold a news conference and declare there is no mad ‘Cow’ or German ‘goat’ infecting his sheep and that they are all healthy to vote ‘stand trial’ for ‘genocide’ and a ‘failure of duty to protect all God’s children - small and great’ as this is no bull poop. Baa, Baa, Baa. The Liberal sheep have all been ‘swined’ and dined and now all must join in a celebration song of a sheepish victory: “We’re cabinet sheep who have lost their way, Baa, Baa, Baa. Liberal sheepsters not really free, Liberals in the grip of Insanity, Lord, have mercy on such as we. Baa, Baa, Baa.” What will the QUEEN BEE say?

(Paraphrasing, with apologies to Stephen Gray and the Whip and Poof oops I meant Whippenpoof song.)
Anti copyright acknowledging the farcical/genocidal/eugenical British/American/Canadian
Baa Baa Baarking mad government

Part 4 / 4th Press Release
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
XXX

Tony Blair: noun 1. politically insane 2. asshole
SOCPA: bullshit 1. gag order 2. of political insanity

Killing foreign children for domestic financial gain. How insane is that for a democratic foreign policy?

- anti copyright Statement of Charity Sweet - Part 4 of 5
FREE bonus lyrics, to get you in the mood... for a stroll down reality lane

7896 words
my opinion/my mind/my heart/my words

the SOCPA grapevine song anticopyright Charity Sweet acknowledging Marvin Gay; paraphrasing with apologies

oh, I bet you wonder how I knew
about your plans to make us blue
with some other guys I think I knew before
between the two of us, God
we love them children more

it came as a surprise, I must say...
when I found out yesterday. Don't you know......

I heard it through the grapevine, not much longer would free speech be mine
oh, I heard it through the grapevine... and I think Ton'y's done gone and lost his mind, honey, honey, yeah...........

I know a woman ain't supposed to cry
but these tears I can't hold inside
losing my voice would end my life, you see
can't you see that's just how much free speech does mean to me.

do you plan to arrest me here?
for the songs I love so dear? Don't you know...

I heard it through the grapevine, not much longer would free speech be mine
oh, I heard it through the grapevine... and I think Ton'y's done gone and lost his mind, honey, honey, yeah...........

SITTING ON THE DOCK OF a 'crock of shit' anticopyright Charity Sweet acknowledging Bill Withers; paraphrasing with apologies

sitting in the morning sun....
I'll be sitting when the evening comes.
watching the shit roll....
then I'll watch 'em roll away again

sittin' on the dock of the bay
watching the tides roll away
sittin' on the dock of the bay.....
wasting time.........

I left my home, Nova Scotia
headed down San Diego way
I got everything to live for
looks like everything is going our way

sittin' on the dock of the bay
watching the clouds roll away
sittin' on the dock of the bay.....
wasting time.........

looks like, somethin' s' gonna change
everything can't remain the same.....
I can't do, what them people tell me to.......
so I guess I'll just remain the same.

sitting here, resting my bones
oh.. this corruption won't leave me alone
three thousand miles I roamed
just to make this dock my home

sittin' on the dock of the bay
watching the bullshit roll away
sittin' on the dock of the bay.....
wasting time.........

Dear Sir: anticopyright Charity Sweet acknowldeging peace - my letter to the editor: to any and all newspapers

i remember when it was humankind
i remember kinder days when i was blind
swimming in the lakes, building castles in the sand
what has happened to my fellow man?

i remember having friends, no enemies
i remember singing songs and climbing trees
now i'm all grown up with wings to fly
how i'm longing for those days gone by

i believe in love and the truth, dear sir
i believe in hope and the future
f*ck your lies, your alibis, don't play me for a fool
my mind is strong and you're just wrong; what you're doing ain't cool
i believe in love and the truth, dear sir
i believe in hope and the future

I've been questioning the changes that i've seen
the lies, the news, the global californian dream
the rat race we've become, the lust, the greed they sell
apathy, pornography, a childhood living hell

i believe in love and the truth, dear sir
i believe in hope and the future
f*ck your fear, my mind is clear - let's talk morality
your game is blame, the world's a shame - who sets molester's free?
i believe in love and the truth, dear sir
i believe in hope and the future

I've been dreaming of a page for history
where the truth is told and our minds are free
if human kind could free some time to think and get a clue
a hollywood production of corruption would shine through

i believe in love and the truth, dear sir
i believe in hope and the future
f*ck your greed, your gm seed, you cannot modify me
f*ck your wars - you corporate whores - learn to live and let be
i believe in love and the truth, dear sir
i believe in hope and the future

i've been wondering just what does this all mean?
why have we been livin' sir's orwellian dreams
sir best beware, true people care - dear sir can't we be friends?
why should our history be your mystery?

dear f*cking sir has lied again!

(or ... ) dear sir: please don't lie again.... Amen XXX

The 'one-faced' people and the 'two-faced' people
... the two races of society
... with two sets of rules of law?

Killing foreign children for domestic financial gain. How insane is that for a democratic foreign policy?
Tony Blair: noun 1. politically insane 2. asshole / SOCPA: bullshit 1. gag order 2. of political insanity
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley

Attention:

Mr. Tony 'the war criminal' and Mrs. "muppet" Blair
a.k.a. George 'bushy-boy's playmates - the Puppets
Hell is as long time a blazin'.
10 Downing Street
Please exit immediately of your own accord or be thrown out publicly. The choice is yours.
Westminster
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
London, England

George 'Bush-y boy'
A.K.A. THE warring HILL-BILLY, with his eyes set on Canadian land/resources/utilities/politics and cheap Mexican labor
***KNOWN ACCOMPLICE*** to the BLAIRS regarding WAR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
The Whitehouse of Blackened Hearts
Please exit immediately of your own accord or be thrown out publicly. The choice is yours.
Washington, D.C.
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
U.S.A.

sir ian 'the Joker' blair
Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis
Please exit immediately of your own accord or be thrown out publicly. The choice is yours.
Scotland Yard
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
London, England

'super-corrupt' Superintendent ian terry "t*sser" who loves to torture peace protesters
Please exit immediately of your own accord or be thrown out publicly. The choice is yours.
Caring Cross Police Station
Charing Cross
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
London, England

district judge(s?) Evans
Horseferry Road Magistrates Courts
What crawled up your ass(es) and died? What is that awful smell?
Is it the stank of of corruption and bullshit?
Please exit immediately of your own accord or be thrown out publicly.
The choice is yours.
a.k.a Westminster Magistrates Courts
Westminster
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
You need to be sectioned, you arseholes.
London, England

district judge right
a.k.a. Judge 'witch-faced' B*tch
"You call yourself a woman?
You should be repected for your participation in the gagging of free speech?
Stand up, sit down - for you?
Oh, great supporter of GENOCIDE.
'Into the docks you go...'
waa waa waa...
Kiss my ass, you evil 'cow'. You are unfit for purpose.
We have a name for women like you, here, in Chatham - 'jook': slang whore (rhymes with book).
You, most certainly, are one of Tony's many corporate, legal whores who lies spread-eagle on a bench of justice 'for sale'.
Do the words, liberty, democracy, and free speech mean anything to you, you whore?
I guess that makes Toady your pimp. Ewwwwwwwwwww... "
- Charity Sweet exercising and 'flexing' free speech.
Please exit immediately of your own accord or be thrown out publicly. The choice is yours.

Horseferry Road Magistrates Courts
a.k.a Westminster Magistrates Courts
Westminster
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley

Barabara Tucker is a wonderful mother and a beautiful person whereas Judge Wrong is an evil, b*tchy, sad, ugly excuse for a woman. WTF? You believe 'because i can...'

"BECAUSE I CAN... "??? - judge right

is reason to SET BAIL CONDITIONS DENYING Barbara Tucker FROM ATTENDING Marleybone COURT, BEING A WITNESS FOR BRIAN HAW AGAINST THE METROPOLITAN POLICE FOR THE GRAND LARCENY OF HIS EVIDENCE OF GENOCIDE AGAINST TOADY??? You sound like that vulgar Mr. Vogler from the Dpg who attempted to section Babs. You are both morons, indisputably.

You sad cow. You feel you have the right and the power and the might to place bail conditions on a person, anywhere in the country, outside the 'designated area', for committing the crime of free speech within the 'designated area'?

Barabara's crimes and Brian's crimes are all non-arrestable offences so why do you insist on imposing the severe penalty of - JAIL - through your despicable twisting of the law and justification as 'breaking bail conditions' regarding a matter that should not even be being discussed in a Magistrate's courtroom with such small minds making such important decsions affecting decent people's lives.

Barbara Tucker notified you assholes, back in March unless I am mistaken, ages ago, of her right to demonstrate free speech as per Toady's SOCPA bullshit and yet her notification still hasn't been acknowledged or accepted. She has played completely by your rules, and she has been nothing but victimized ever since, for what is not an arrestable offence - free speech?
Are you a sadist?

Does DJ Evans pull your strings on one side while Toady tweaks the other???

What's up doc? Why the switch up venues for Tuesday, Sept 12, 2006 Kangaroo convention from the court Babs was attempted to be barred from attending through bail conditions(???) back up to the Horse Ferry Road and why the short notice? Just what exactly are you corrupt morons cooking up for tomorrow???

P.S. Wed, 13, 2006 - They switched up again, late evening, the case was again altered to be heard at Marleybone Courthouse... what a steaming crock of shit. Oh what a tangles web you weave, when first you practise to decieve. On Monday, Barbara challenged her bail conditions and witch-face changed her conditions from not being allowed at Downing Street and Parliament Square to only being allowed in Parliament Square, in all of England?

Effectively, Barbara could be arrested for breaking bail conditions if she is known to be anywhere else in the city of London, other than Parliament Square or even, anywhere else in England; completely disregarding her alternate home address in Redding and her rights as a human being. How many times must the powers of this land stomp all over her human rights? How many times?

Judge Right you are one sad, stupid b*tch.

"BECAUSE I CAN..." ???

NO YOU MAY NOT!
So says democracy and Barabara Tucker's honourable barrister.

"PISS OFF you evil cow!" - so says me!

I think you are attemping to bully and instigate, if not create the conditions for an offence that will place Babs and Brian in jail, before Thursday's real 'KANGAROO COURT' proceedings where Barabara and her barrister will argue ABUSE OF PROCESS - your personal specialty - you corrupt, freak of justice. Is it you and Toady's dream and desire to wipe free speech from the pavement of Parliament Square and from outside the warmonger's gates - 10 Downing Street, as well as all England?

And you are stupid enough to think that we, the people, are not going to speak out regarding your corruption and gross abuse of legal processes within English law and democracy.

Hell is a long time a blazin'.
London, England

The Home Office
The lights are on? Is anyone home?
Have you all completely lost your marbles?
Killing foreign children for domestic financial gain? How insane is that for a democratic foreign policy?
What in God's name are you doing and what the hell are you thinking?
I understand it is your practice to incarcerate refugees, including women and children, and I also understand it is your policy to allow them freedom should they provide evidence that they have been tortured, in their native countries.
Why, in God's name, was a black man with no fingernails - they were all pulled out in his country of origin as a form of torture, not asked if he had been tortured and why was the box regarding said question of torture circled NO? Why, when he was finally asked if he had been tortured, after a good doctor took up his case and intervened on his behalf, did he put his two hands on the desk with not one fingernail in place as a response? Wasn't it obvious? Are you folks thick as shite?
WTF?
www.medicaljustice.org.uk - that what!
Westminster
"A mother's love is sacred" - Damian Marley
London, England

c/o Caring Cross Police Station
Charing Cross
London, England
02073217711

c/o Belgravia Police Station: S.O.S.
Where I understand there are some good men and women of honor, real 'coppers' and 'bobbies', please be an independent eye witness, willing to testify in a court of law.
Belgravia
London, England

c/o Victim Supportline: S.O.S.
Victims of crime - support and advice in London
Criminal Justice System
P.O. Box 11431
London, England
SW9 6ZH

c/o CAMPAIGN AGAINST CRIMINALISING COMMUNITIES(CAMPACC) S.O.S.
"The 'War on Terror' promotes a racist culture of suspicion towards migrant and Muslim communities. It generates and manipulates fears to justify a perpetual state of war. 'Terrorist suspects' are created by several means:
- by redefining terrorism in broader ways, blurring any distinction between anti-government protest and organized violence against cilvilains
- by placing entire communities under suspicion of associating with such 'terrorism'
- by using 'intelligence' obtained by torturing detainees abroad
- by waging psychological warfare through disinformation and mass-media scares about 'Al-Qaeda'
- by using anti-terrorist powers to detain people (especially refugees) for suspected activities which could just as well be handled under other laws"
www.campacc.org.uk

c/o www.statewatch.org S.O.S.
- for material on legislation, please visit
? the Terrorism Act 2000
? Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001
? Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005
? SOCPA - Serious organized Criminal protection Agency

c/o email:
"Subject: tucker - is the use of 6 x 4 (plank of wood) to protect myself - reasonable force -YET???" - Barbara Tucker
operation-cx@met.police.uk
public-inquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
complaints@cps.gsi.gov.uk
Andrew.robinson@met.police.uk
inquiries@ipcc.gov.uk
c/c:

Mr. Brian 'THE peace-maker' W. Haw
Parliament Square
London, England

The 'amazingzingly beautiful' Barbara Tucker
Parliament Square
London, England

Steve 'The True English Gentle Man' Jago
Parliament Square
London, England

Chris 'the extraordinary, true English, brilliant pacifist' Coverdale
Wimbledon, England

Justice
extraordinary, brilliant minds of justice high-lighting the libertines of our times
England
via email

Liberty
extraordinary, brilliant libertarians and up-holders of liberty, peace, justice and free speech
England
via email

rikki
- an 'old-school', young, 'real' reporter of reality as the facts support, without political bias
you anti capitalist, you.
indymedia u.k.
london, england

Queen Elizabeth II
Please bring home 'your' army. Please return 'our' nation's sons and daughters immediately and safely; home to English soil. Please.
Buckingham Palace
London, England

Princess Diana's boys XXX
c/o Kensington Palace
London, England

The Independent newpaper
London, England

The Guardian newspaper
London, England

The Evening Standard newspaper
London England

The Sun Newspaper
London, England
The British Law Society
England

Judge Which-face?

"Is this Westminster-gate?"
- Mr. Brian W. Haw

"How can this court case possibly continue, your honor, when the police have stolen almost all of my evidence? How can this trial possibly continue?"
- Mr. Brian W. Haw

"How many times must a man beg for justice, from a judge, in a court of law, in England? How many times must he repeat himself? Abuse of process. Abuse of process. Abuse of process.
How many times must I repeat myself, repeat myself, repeat myself in writing, before we, the people, are heard and understood? We demand peace. We demand justice. We won't accept anything less. We peacefully stand for true democracy, not anarchy and terrorism - that's your job. Idiots."
- Charity Sweet

"oh I wish I was a punk-rocker with flowers in my hair...
in '77 and '69 revolution was in the air
I was born too late, to a world that doesn't care
oh I wish I was a punk-rocker with flowers in my hair."
- Sandi Thom, Canada; from the album 'Smile... it confuses people'

It's poetry; the lyics above have many meanings and yet the simplest is the easiest to digest. The 'flowers in her hair' gives reference to a hippy mentality which is purely peaceful - love. The punk-rocker mentality is of an English based 'f*ck you' - 'I am gonna do what I am gonna do' nature. Put together, they meld into a peaceful individual, not out to break the law, merely expressing clearly what is on their mind - love - through action and art - nothing illegal - only crimialised by the government, and not willing to stop for anyone or anything, as they are harming no one.

Is it a crime to express the truth, in creative, artistic ways, in a peaceful manner, in public? Is Sandi Thom a serious organized criminal for writing a song and is said song, her thoughts put to melody in harmony with varying instruments accompanying her voice, a security risk? Give me a f*cking break...

Maybe you have to be Canadian to understand her mentality or just young enough at heart to get in tune with her music. The new 'gag' of Tony'y political police farce and henchmen is gonna to be trying to accuse the peace protesters of being 'anarchists' - solely out for destructive purposes. Calling us crazy didn't work as it didn't wash over very well with Joe Public and a member of MIND so now it's 'the peace protesters are Anarchists, bent on destruction', so says Toady and his Metropolitan police farce of London.

Anarchists? NO... that would be them. Like Pete of Big Brother, we wouldn't hurt a fly - it's not in our nature. We are demonstrating for peace in case anyone failed to notice???

Verbal assalts are our only means of defense against those who sport very big automatic guns and very bad attitudes and like to get very physically involved in subduing peaceful protest. Reasoning just doesn't seem to work with these idiots. Shaming them publicly, is what we do best and, most probably, is why they take such pleasure in being violent to us, once illegally detained.

They ask for it and we give it. My mum taught me that if you dish it out, you have to be able to take it. No one can shovel shit out their mouths like some of the idiots, enforcing Toady's SOCPA legislation, we have been dealing with lately - lacking common sense is putting it mildy; hell bent on physical violence and blind denial of that behaviour would be a more appropriate description of the Charing Cross gang of thugs, the Dpg and the cPs.

We would not destroy or steal the property of another, unlike sir 'weak link' and his 'weak-minded' crony - Tony. It 'kind of' goes against the principles we all believe in - those not dissimiliar from the Bible. The Metropolitan police are a different story altogether and a very different kettle of fish. We all have clean track records in those areas whereas I hear, here, like Canada, it's a matter of 'what officer doesn't have a complaint against him of assalt or has been accused of being a racist idiot' - bog standard corrupted policing forces.

It's common practice for Canadian police, especially known to myself, in Eastern Canada, to steal evidence and to plant evidence... how pathetic is that? It was explained to me that corrupt Nova Scotian police officers are known to carry a gun with the serial numbers rubbed off, under the front seat, in their patrol cars, should the need arise for them to plant a weapon on someone they just shot, wothout just cause - that was explained to me by a radio presenter and son of a Justice of the Peace, in Canada.

Honestly... same shit - different country?

Is the very same thing is happening over here? How difficult must it be for the good officers of the law, to work within such abhorant corruption? As bad as it is for a good teacher to work in a school system where there is a peadophile ring - Halifax Regional Municipality Schoolboard, Halifax a.k.a. HRM, Nova Scotia, Canada? The Maritime Provinces, the land of the loyalists and what used to be known as Lower Canada.

Can you imagine a school system having paedophile insurance? Sound insane?

Nova Scotia is... so much for tourism Mr. Senator, ex-premiere of Nova Scotia: Buchanan you dirty, filthy nonse.

If it weren't for Buchanan's buddy, ex Prime Minister Paul Martin who just so happened to collude in the September 11 bombing of New York as I reported to the New York Police and Inspector Augustus Augustus(how could I ever forget that name?), of the FBI, you'd be in the 'clink'. Ex-PM Paul Martin was also caught with some $70,000,000 worth of cocaine strapped to the bottom of one of his shipping line boats, as reported in the local media.

Was he arrested by the R.C.M.P. - our federal police? Hell no. And people wonder how the drugs get into our communities - democratic, politically-corrupt government. The town of Bridgewater, Nova Scotia is our main center for cocaine distribution. When I was a child, their was an army of police inpectors searching the containers that come off the ships that enter our harbour, for illegal drugs. My, how things have changed...

My English mate worked at the secret location which everyone in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia knows as ******** where all containers of a suspicious nature, are inspected for Weapons of Mass Destruction - WMD's. Apparently Halifax checks all containers that are to go onto the U.S.A., as well.

One fine day, in their compound, there was a container with rocket propelled this and super machine gun that and grenades - all sorts of toys for the U.S. army boys. Now if I was a terrorist, which I am not, what would it have taken for me to access said goodies?

The container was left out in the backyard. There were no guard dogs, no security surveilance systems, no patrolling night watchmen... no barbed wire, just a six foot fence. The only thing I needed to access that container was the ability to climb a six foot fence (easy-peasy) and a pair of normal average everyday pliers to break the seal on the container. These are supposed to be security measures against weapons of mass destruction?

Of course I called up my local radio station and told them of this idiocy. Rick Howe, or Rick the pr*ck, as I call him poo-pooed me, as usual. Co-incidently, two weeks later a container was stolen directly from the port and not from their secret hiding spot. Chappie drove in, past two security check-points, stole a container and drove out past two security check points, as also reported in local media. What does that tell you? Unfit for purpose springs to my mind.

They also have two sniffer dogs at the secret location. One works and the other doesn't. Or, you could say that when they want to find something they bring out the dog with the good nose and greater sense of detection of drugs. The doggie with the no sense or detecting abilities is brought out when? When they want to slide something through???

Their idea of Security, considering all the fear-mongering they spread in the media, is a joke; that is the first point I am trying to get across to you; the second point being that drugs are consciously allowed into Canada by government. I would be foolish to think that England is any different considering the apparent consistencies I have witnessed between the two countries - it is a pattern, I keep noticing.

Ex-PM Paul Martin's response to the Canadian people and the R.C.M.P. was to go ahead and charge him. He felt secure in the knowledge that he had enough money and enough friends on the bench to drag the case on indefinitely and financially break the country. Canada, as a country, would go broke before he did in the pursuance of criminal charges of cokaine distribution on a mahousive level, by our Prime Minister, through his corrupt legal system of injustice.

Isn't it funny that it was also Martin who came to the rescue of ex-Premiere Buchanan, when the good R.C.M.P. were closing down on him and his paedophile friends, and rewarded him with a Senatorship and $70,000.00 per anum, for the rest of his disgusting life, for molesting the boys of the Shelburne Boys School, along with many, many other children. How sick is that?

Mind you, another ex-Premiere of Nova Scotia - Regan - was accused of raping 7 women. These seven women went to court, were raped once again by the crown persecution system and a mistrial was declared. They went back again and yet again, another mistrial was declared. They went back a third time and another mistrial was declared. Financially depleted of all assets, as was planned, and having lost all hope of ever recieving justice, the women gave up the fight. Martin knew full well what he was talking about and was well aware of what he was capable of doing in collusion with his corrupt buddies.

People all over the world think Canada is such a 'nice' place. Reality check: media black-out.

From England, I watched hurricane Juan rip up the eastern seaboard of the United States. Once it hit Canada - did it hit Canada? Nothing was reported globally, not here in England, anyway. Imagaine my surprise when I returned to Halifax, only to find that hurricane Juan had indeed hit my hometown. The eye of the hurricane entered the second deepest harbour of the world, a Naval port, and ripped the shit out of the city. The name Juan was retired due to the devastation it caused in Halifax. Why didn't I view this from England when it was all happening? Media Blackout?

Halifax also had White Juan, a few years back - the same year if I remember correctly, as our media named this particular disaster. There were snow drifts of 14/15 feet. I had to crawl with my daughter el-commando style, on our stomachs, over the snow to get milk and bread to survive. The government declared a STATE OF EMERGENCY, for quite some time. Over 150,000 people were without electricity for over one week - no heat, no access to food, in the dead of winter and the worst blizzard that had ever hit Halifax, Nova Scotia - HRM.

Imagine my surprise when I called, at that time, over to the English media and they replied they had no knowledge of said catastrophe, that winter. I requested that they check 'the wire' for the story and nothing was to be found. To convince said reporter of the BBC, I asked him to go to the internet and look up my local newspaper, the Chronic Snail (The Chronicle Herald) - our only broadsheet newspaper, and the front page of said event - he was shocked. His response, "Is their a media black-out?" Apparently so.

Did you hear about the mad cow diease scare in Canada. No, you wouldn't have heard about it from Halifax, Nova Scotia. The nurse I spoke to, detained by government, said, "It's insane. They have the whole ward on lock down. None of the doctor's or the nurses are allowed to leave the ward. We are locked inside the ward, literally. We're not allowed to speak to anyone. I could get in so much shit for just talking to you." They were held captive for one week solid. Did government think that none of their family members would notice their absence?

My mate went to all the 'Regan the rapist' hearings and his response was "They couldn't have been lying. There were just too many of them and they were all saying the same thing. Regan - hell was made for mother-f*cker's like you. May you burn in hell, you b*stard of a rapist.

Ex- PM Martin, even more curious, was Finance Minister before he was PM. Him and all the finance ministers - G8 - met in Halifax, Nova Scotia the summer before 911 New York and the summer after and haven't been seen there since, to my knowledge. I assert that they went there to cook up 911, work out the financing of said operation of state sponsored terrorism and then met the summer after to congratulate themselves. How sick is that?

How do I know, what I know, you might ask? I have eyes to see and ears to hear and a mind to put the puzzle pieces together of what many just cannot envision - the truth. I also like to talk to folks, in general. I'm a people person. Today's government is really ugly and the corruption runs all the way down 'from' the top - not 'to' the top.

Phil Verge made a cup of tea and a bowl of popcorn, 20 minutes before 911 and sat down to watch the show. How sick is that? His brother is part of the 'privie'(sp?) council who advices the completely-corrupt Nova Scotia government how to proceed. Is it co-incidence that their father was a grand poo-pa for the Masons?

The New York police told me they had recieved thousands of phone calls from people such as myself - people who knew about 911 BEFORE it happened, people who feel guilty for another's crime and their own inability to do anything to alter the shape of future events; people who now know that democratic government is the assailant of government sponsored terrorism against it's own people.

Will there be an inquiry into the same shite of 'who' perpetrated 'what' onto the civilians in London? Are they really going to incriminate themselves? Highly unlikely...

I met a few of ex-Premiere Buchanan's victims who were paid off for un-investigated claims and given a gag order to account for their sexual abuse as children; crimes committed against children by Buchanan, personally, and his cronies, and covered up on his behalf, at 'whose' request - by said cronies, of course. Crimes stemming from the Shelburne boys home are indicative of collusion within the Nova Scotia judicial system of government bodies and a bunch of nonses. Or are they one and the same?

As men, the Shelburne boys stood up and sued the government for child molestation. As reported by an independent Judge from Quebec - all claims went un-investigated and each and every claim was paid off, complete with gag order. Next, the teachers all came forward and sued as some felt they had unjustly been accused of paedophilia. Same shit - different day. All teachers were paid off and issued a GAG ORDER. And that is how the school 'nonse' insurance works.

When your child is molested at a school in Nova Scotia, CANADA, you recieve a cheque from whichever b*stard insurance company (most probably ING: Ignorance Never Gives, the bank with no branches and no records of corruption) is happy to provide such insane insurance and... a GAG ORDER. Then, he/she is moved onto the next school, the molester, that is, the perpetrator of the crime, while you and your child suffer in silence. That is kind of making a whore out of that child in my mind - democracy's whore - the molested child - complete with an insurance pay off. Sick!

God as my witness, I am telling the truth. I caught two of the bastards and started crowing very loudly in Canada. As a mother, how could I say nothing? How could I not challenge such perverse corruption? I sang out loudly, right to their faces.

Surprise, surprise... I was banned from the Nova Scotia legislature under the Protection of Private(?) Property Act and from the school, under the same act, with the 'nonse' for a principal: Mr. Brownlowe. Being the ex-Mayor's son, he had a certain pull in that hick, shit-hole nest of 'nonses' - HRM - and just slithered onto the next Junior High school, preparing to groom his next victims. The other shithead was Mr. MacGuiness, who thought he could 'perve' on me when I was in his grade 8 maths class, oh so many years ago. He made me feel so 'uncomfortable'. Thinking of it, even now, gives me the heebie-jeebies. That filthy, filthy disgusting creature of a man should not be allowed anywhere near children and should be locked up, if there was any justice in this world.

I certainly remembered him when I found out he was principal of my son's elementary school, upon our return to Canada. I questioned him specifically as to where his boundaries were. The cockroach scurried from the light of truth - protected by government.(?)

Curiously, my son's grade 6 sex education literature was... 'Hey it's o.k. to be gay.' That's fine.

'Experiment with your sexuality on both sides of the fence' to an 11 year old child?

Encouraging children to experiement sexually, at 11 years of age, with homosexuality?

I don't f*cking think so... smells and smacks of grooming to me in political-correct speak. Of course, MacGuiness was moved on even before the school year ended, caught out, bang to rights, by me. Has anything changed? Do these men still have their jobs working with children? Yes, I am sad to say, they do.

In Canada, social services are happy with 12 year old children having sex... they have no key issues. "Kids are doing it anyway..." Does that make it right and proper to attempt to legally lower the age of sexual consent to 14 and eventually to 12?

As a society, do we want 12 year old children having sex and therefore possibly having children of their own, at that age? Is that what I want for England's children, Canadian children or any child, for that matter? Do I f*ck.

Why is it that EVERYONE KNOWS THAT, AS A SOCIETY, ENGLAND HAS 'NONSE' JUDGES, serving up 'justice'(?), sitting on the benches of democracy, just like in Canada? I would call that a pattern and it may very well be a conspiracy; regardless, I have a mathematical mind and I notice the patterns. Funny enough, the patterns of change I see in England, I have seen in Canada and in the United States as I also lived in San Diego, California for six years. Co-incidence? Pattern or conspiracy. I'll vote pattern lest they call me looney and try and section me for being a whistle - blower.

The Nova Scotian politicians came up with Bill 109 a few years back - whistleblower legislation that the Canadian Mental Health Association cited as very Nazi, by nature. Canada chose a different angle than Tony's SOCPA gag order of free speech to silence the public whistle-blowers, albeit familiar in these crazy times: to mandate the questioning/Nazi interrogation of the sanity of any and all whistle-blowers, by corrupt government doctors, and have them sent off to the funny farm, A.S.A.P. Isn't that what the DpG attempted against Barbara Tucker at the 'gates of hell', a week ago last Sunday?

Idiot-face 'vulgar' DpG 'guppy-brain' Vogler accused Babs of needing sectioning for standing peacefully with a banner at the gates of hell. Babs notified the corruption of her intent to protest as per their insane legislation and her demonstration has not yet been authorised... since March? But she has been bullied, threatened, harassed, illegally detained and tortured at the hands of Tony's minions.

Who is the nutter, here? Using his best 'vulgar' DpG logic, DpG 'muppet' Vogler determined and explained that it was very possible, that someone was going to assalt Babs and therefore, 'she' needed to be sectioned to protect herself from the imaginary percieved threat of that DpG guppy-mind. Sounds like Toady's train of thought on imaginary Moslem terrorism here in England - victimize and criminalize the innocent, target the Moslem and the peace activist.

Are the Dpg and Osama mates? Are they a terrorist cell? Someone please call SO13 or SO19 - the anti terrorism units of Scotland Yard - or MI5 please.

Who is doing the terrorizing and criminalising of whose communities? Our government. Farcical...

The O.J. Simpson trial, another farce, is just the tip of the iceburg that is pretty much global systemic police corruption and institutionalized racism. Where I come from, the politics are very, very racist, as are the politicians, the police and those in power. Remember - a fish is rotten from its head on down.

Two 11 year old children were strip-searched, in a HRM school, by police, in front of the principal, I believe, without their parents present for a $5.00 note that was appently stolen - worth about £2.00 in English currency. The police officer, in question was appropriately accused of being racist as there is no way in hell she would have tried to get away with that shit against white children. Oddly, she sued because "her feelings were hurt" for being called a racist and won $250,000.

Am I the only person in the world who is able to see the gross insanity of that situation? What about those two little girls? What about their parents? What about justice and democracy?

I find a racist idiot easy to spot - I guess you get a sense for these things in life. Racism is a sure sign of ignorance in my books.

Speaking of idiots, racists and lunatics - what about this Masonic cult?

Wakey-wakey folks! I know the monster I am calling out into the public eye. They are not the very 'nice' people they portray themselves to be, by way of the outer circle of projected kindness; the Shriner's and the do-gooders and the church-goers who are always to be seen in the front pews, every Sunday; those who generally, sometimes even unknowingly, cover up for the dirty dogs at the top - those who hold their infamous secret.

A fish is rotten from it's head on down. That is a fact. Corruption starts at the top and is filtering its way down into society, in case anyone failed to notice.

Mr. Perry Mason - what is your secret or do you want me to rat you out? Piss off and crawl back under the rock you crawled out from. Leave the good folks alone and especially, their children. We, the parents of humanity, have a particularily nice holiday planned for the cream of your crew, the elite - NONSE island. No breeding rights for you, Mr. and Mrs. Eugenics. I digress... back to theft.

I repeat...

The police have stolen the evidence and property of Brian W. Haw; notably needed for your (apparently and hopefully not) 'kangaroo' court of breaking exactly whose illegal conditions and his curious trial which also happens to be a gross abuse of legal processes.

He previously displayed, openly and publicly, said evidence of GENOCIDE and retained his personal legal property against the above noted 'JOKER' and the above noted government/war criminals, for almost 5 years, until it was needed for these and other trumped up, ridiculous charges imposed by sir ian blair on behalf of Tony a.k.a. THE War Criminal, and somehow (clandestine dawn raid involving 78(?!) police) stolen by said policing farce, in collusion with and on the behalf of our muppet/puppet/dictator Prime Minister - Tony 'the Toad' Blair.

2 + 2 = 4 in any language. A + B = C? C'a va? Tu compris? Est-ce que tu as une mal a la tete?(sp?)

Beauty may only be skin deep and in Tony's 'case of insanity' and in this insane 'law' suit against Mr. Brian W. Haw and free speech, within these duly noted 'special' circumstances - ugly is straight through to the bone! Does 'abuse of process' ring any legal bells or set off any landmines of understanding? Does anyone understand what 'advanced disclosure' means? The tainting of evidence and the event of a mistrial has both been known to occur in English law and therefore exist in reality and do aptly apply in this case, specifically.

"Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not steal."
- God, the Christian Bible

I think it's high time for a bit of morality and getting back to the basic tenants of the Bible within a democracy that is based on the Bible, as its ultimate book of law. England is a Christian nation, I believe. Isn't the Church of England - the Anglicans - Christian? Kind of makes you wonder when they are holding a big party in the College Gardens of Westminster Abbey for the politicians and the bomb-makers, BAE, the ones who build the bombs that kill the children. Weren't the Anglicans once accused of being in bed with weapons dealers? Did I not see, with my own two eyes, that fact verified for myself?

Sister Elizabeth: what the hell is your church thinking and what have you been doing? Partying with the bomb-makers and the politicians who have publicly stated, 'people must die.' It makes me want to throw up...

"Jesus loves the children - all the children of the world
red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight
Jesus loves the little children of the world."

I doubt Jesus, the man who through out the money-lenders from the temple, would approve of your little BAE bash with those big marquis and all those damn gold lawn chairs (I have never seen the likes before and hope I never will again), sister Elizabeth. Maybe the Anglican church needs to go back and re-read the Bible and the ten commandments - specifically. Start with the basics... so you don't get confused again.

In times of desparation, almost all will cry out to God for help - even the atheist. "God, please help me, my child. God... why?" God gets blamed for a lot of things, too. "God, why didn't you change things?"

Does God have the power to change the minds and hearts of free men? Can God force you to act of His accord? No.

We are all free men to follow our own hearts - where ever that may lead us. I think that is why He gave us free will - to stear our own boat and be responsible for ourselves and to ourselves. We are each responsible for what we do and say and how we act. Those are the simple facts. We are also responsible for each other, as any good family member should behave - humanity is my extended family.

If and when God does choose to intervene, that is what us mere mortals call a miracle. Will a miracle happen? Can the truth come to light... for all its ugliness, by the Glory and through the Grace of God?

I believe in miracles. I have seen many. How fortunate am I?

In my past, I have fractured five vertebrae, been completely paralised and went on to wear a back brace for a year, and now, I am fine as kind. I have danced with the death-causing disease Lupus and God willing, I am still here and healthy as a horse.

I believe that I see what others overlook. It is the simple things in life that matter and God works his miracles in the most beautiful ways. He just shines a light and things happen. The sun rises and flowers open; every dawn brings a new day; mother's and father's concieve children and participate in the miracle of childbirth and the joy of watching a child grow... and life goes on. Humanity will overcome this devilish spirit of corruption - this I believe with all my heart.

My God is the God of a second chance. My God always forgives. My God is always loving. My God wants me to learn and be better for the experience of life. In this modern day and age, finding these humane qualities within humanity, is a miracle, in itself.

When I think of God, I think of my children and how much I love them and what I wouldn't do for them. If that is the way I am towards my children, how must our Heavenly father feel and behave towards us? He loves us more - unconditionally, no matter what, eternally. There is nothing that He wouldn't do... except for make our decisions for us.

Jesus came to teach, not to dictate. That's what the Bible taught me. God gave each living soul a free spirit/free will and, hopefully, a mind and a voice, coupled with two eyes to see and two ears to hear.

I am teaching my children to stand on their own two feet and be responsible for their actions and their emotions. I am teaching them to think for themselves and have compassion for others. I am here to guide them into adulthood; a life of their choice and of their own making. N.B. The children in Palestine and Iraq have little choice and no voice that can be heard, over here, regarding their futures.

Could God be a parent to all religions - a shining example of love and understanding? Could we follow that example?

Maybe it is humanity that needs to take responsibility for the decisions made by humans. War, for example, is a choice made by man - or a certain few men. I am certain more warring would not be God's choice or His answer for the world's turmoil.

God didn't give much of the life on this planet a voice box capable of speech and a mind capable of forming thoughts: the ability to communicate; just us, I think - humanity. And we are the ones who are ruining the environment upon which all life depends upon? That is insanity - irrational, to say the least.

When is a time for talking? When will the fighting end so we can talk, reasonably and rationaly?

Sometimes, children need to learn for themselves, the difference between right and wrong through experiencing the consequences of poor decision making skills, stemming from a lack of reasoning ability usually coupled with a lack of life experience; war is 'dead as a doornail' wrong.

Back in 1991, the child mortality rate in Iraq was 1 in 5, under 5. The sanctions we, G8 nations, brought upon the foreign state of Iraq, are what surged the death rate of children so high, back then. Is that reasonable or rational or moral? What are we now doing or turning a blind eye towards - sanctioning the Palestinian children and those of so many other nations.

Iraq: 1 in 5, under 5 dies - that was then. What about now? Genocide is the only word appropriate for the state of the Iraqi children or lack thereof.

Today, the world's most dangerous highway is the road to Baghdad, Iraq. Children line the highway with one shoe, no shoes - orphans of all ages, begging for water and/or food. The Iraqi children are literally on the front line of this illegal war - this statement beggars belief.

Out of the kindness of their hearts, our soldiers, those who illegally occupy Iraq, generously give what they can of the meagre rations that they have been given. Our soldiers have shown great kindness on that dangerous highway. They have shown great compassion for the Iraqi children. Will you? Will you show comassion for the soldiers?

A chap in the army has recently switched over jobs to picking up the wounded, in helicopters, in Iraq. Yesterday, he picked up a five year old child and the child was severely burnt - we all know burns are known to be the most painful of all injuries to suffer.

The pilot said, "It is awful." The children run over as soon as he lands and beg for water. The children have learnt the English word for 'water' quickly, in their own homeland, since Saddam left power/was deposed illegally - regime change is another illegal act we, G8 nations, carried out in Iraq.

If I remember correctly... "Kibit mia" is Chaldean, the Christian language of Iraq, for "I want water." Maybe we should learn their language as it is their country we have invaded and are systematically destroying. There wasn't a water shortage under that mad man Hussein - just us. How sad is it that life was far kinder to the Iraqi peoples under that lunatic's leadership? What does that say about us?

"Water. Water. Water. Water. Water..........", the Iraqi children cry out for.

The soldiers give what they can...

I am so ashamed of the government of this country.

I am, alternately, so proud of the compassion some of our soldiers are showing to some of their children.

'It' just shouldn't be happening - GENOCIDE - the wanton destruction of other nation's children and their families. We need to go into Iraq and dig wells for those children... and for the Palestinian children too, and many other nations. F*ck drilling for oil and bombing the shit out of children's homes and communities for some sad b*stard's sadistic pleasure and for their monetary gain.

Very few soldiers enjoy killing children and that was a statement that should never have to be said. Will you show compassion for our soldiers who were ordered to murder? My heart goes out to them. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes, over there, for all the money and gold and silver in the world... not as a soldier of an insane dictator, as part of an illegal occupation, under insane conditions, watching so many children suffer and die, needlessly. It must be heart breaking for most soldiers to witness, I imagine.

When will humanity ever learn that war is wrong - killing is wrong? Stealing life is wrong. Stealing the life of a child is beyond wrong. And still God forgives even the murderer, should he have a change of heart. God knows our hearts - that is a miracle - such great unconditional love for all of humanity, even for those who refuse to believe or have faith in a God of unconditional love; all are still loved, regardless.

I bet God is crying a river of tears for all the children and blessings He sent to the earth that have been destroyed, shamefully. War and destruction are synonymous - the anithesis to life and creation.

The earth does not belong to an evil bunch of liars. The earth was created for all the world's children to live in peace, in a loving, beautiful, hospitable environment - like no other in our solar system. It's not supposed to be a living hell for most children and a bed of roses for the elite few 'adults' who govern democracy unjustly. Illogical. Irrational. Unreasonable.

Logic? Who says Pluto is no longer a planet so all the science books need to be re-written? Science was the only subject these morons could not dumb down within the school system of Joe public's education. Demoting PLUTO is their best chance for a mass burning of all science books and the world as we understand it to be, scientifically. The depth of their insanity boggles my mind. The greed and ignorance they exhibit goes far beyond any reasoning.

As I re-read these pages, I am shocked to know and understand the world, as it is - my life experience of it. My father was a mason and a slum-lord. When I was in grade 8, a girl in my school, in grade 9, used to live in one of my father's rooming houses(bedsits). He also used to sleep with her as payment of rent. Dear old Dad also bought off a judge for three counts of murder - my mum never lied to me. Later on in life, I met the friends of the family that he had killed and I felt guilty for the crimes my father had committed.

'I' felt so ashamed of 'their' complete inhumanity and corruption. Now, as an adult, I feel no shame, only complete blind rage towards those who perpetuate insanity onto and into the lives of just common, average, everyday folk. My dad, the mason, was a violent man by nature and a murderer amongst other things. I guess you could say that I am the progeny of a mason that has gone 'Pete tong - wat went wong.' I have a conscience and my mother's heart - a heart big enough for all humanity when coupled with her courage, strength and wisdom.

As I was quoted by a good officer of the HRM police when battling the schoolboard in a courtroom of corruption: "She said she wasn't going to stop". Yes I made that statement and yes it is true.

The bent judge also said "I don't want to hear the facts."

My response? "Do, what?"

His response? " I don't want to hear the facts ... right now."

He never heard the facts as I was effectively silenced, in that courtroom.

I will not be silenced nor shut up unless 'they' place a bullet between my eyes. So if you idiots plan on 'Dr. Kellying' me, get on with it. I have everything to live for so don't bother with suicide bullshit in association with my name. The public won't buy what you might be selling. They have been informed otherwise. The only people who want to see my ass six feet under are those I am crowing about in this statement, dispite the fact that I am a mother of three wonderful, beautiful, intelligent, compassionate children.

The children of this world are worth fighting for - until my last breath. I grew up with violence, abuse and privelage - I am not speaking 'out my ass'. I grew up on a street of Doctor's and Lawyer's, politicians and money. I am not threatened, at all, by men with guns, corrupt politicians, bent judges or the powers that be. My only weapon, and the only weapon I need is - the truth, and a voice to speak up or sing out, as whichever the case may be. God is on my side and 'has my back'. This I know 'for a fact, Jack' and that's all I need to know.

"How big is your brown envelope, your honor?"
- Mr. Brian W. Haw, Mrs. Charity Sweet, Mr. Steve Jago and Ms. Barbara Tucker, in unison.

Your Honor, I repeat myself for the last time: please grow some English 'bollocks' and throw this 'B.S.' case out of the window and into the rubbish heap where it belongs. Please dismiss all charges against Mr. Brian W. Haw and return his personal property and legal documents immediately, accepting that a theft has taken place - no joke, whatsoever.

Until the application of the conditions, let alone the justification for the conditions is argued in the High Courts of this land, punishing Mr. Brian Haw, in the meanwhile, let alone incarcerating him, in the mean time, is completely out of the question due to an obvious corruption and gross abuse of the legal processes.

"It's too late for two-faced apologies."
- Damian Marley; Bob's boy from Jamaica, the former and present-day American slave colony.

Please show your one true face and do what is right and just by democracy, courage and truth, your honor.

Please shame the devil and tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, your honor, as you are sworn to God, on the Bible, to the people and paid by said people to uphold the rights of the children and the people above and place them firmly before the interests of the government and big business - the greedy and the few - the War Machine.

Westminster Magistrates Court
Westminster
London, England

ken livingstone
As Mayor, please speak out for the people of this great city of London. Please speak up for peace and free speech. Please.
* All note: please make sure everyone listed receives advanced disclosure of this statement.
Mayor of London
London, England:

I ain't knock, knockin' on Heaven's door -
I am rattling the GATES OF HELL...
singing out to the rooftops for justice
@10 DOWNING STREET: the home of the second rising / third Reich.

God, help us, please. XXX

The War Crimes Division of Scotland Yard
Knock, Knock.
Is there anyone there, please? Can you help, please? Please?
I am begging for your help.
Scotland Yard
London, England

Royal High Courts of Justice
"We, the people, demand justice for all humankind."
S.O.S. to any good folk - please help
London, England

The House of Lords
S.O.S. to any good folk - please help
Westminster
London, England

The Houses of Parliament
S.O.S. to any good folk - please help
Westminster
London, England

The 'vulgar' DpG – The Diplomatic 'plastic' Protection Group
S.O.S. to any good folk - please help
Westminster
London, England

The 'crooked' cPs – The Crown Prosecution Service/persecution system
Westminster
S.O.S. to any good folk - please help
London, England
September 10th, 2006

Dear Sirs:

I cordially invite you to take a walk down reality lane with me.

Shall we?

PHOTOGRAPHIC AND RECORDED EVIDENCE: TO BE ADDED as PART 5 - a Stroll Down Reality Lane
If the corrupt arseholes didn't like the first three parts, they will certainly be distressed by Part 4 and ...
Part 5 is sure to be the knock out blow!

??? - unedited version released due to severe time restrictions placed by Westminster Magistrates Court. They are attempting to sweep free speech under the rug A.S.A.P. - S.O.S. ???

"Who took all Brian's stuff, mummy?" - my daughter

"The police." - me

"Why did the police steal all Brian's stuff mummy? That was naughty."

- my seven year old daughter. She saw how large the display of evidence of Genocide had become the day before the dawn raid in which it was illegally taken and this was her first comment to me, the next day, when approaching Parliament square, from some twenty to thirty feet away. She knows right from wrong. Do you?

Forever seeking that story of "The 100th Monkey" of kindness within the reality of the psyche of all humanity - peace to everyone, everywhere, always. And the world... could be a better place...

- a mom and member of humankind

Kindest Regards,

Charity Sweet
XXX

www.ninecommentaries.com

anti copyright Charity Sweet acknowledging the persistent efforts of Princess Diana Spencer, Steve, Babs, Chris, Maya, Mark, rikki, Eric, Code Pink, Maria and Brian and many more enlightened reasonable logical minds