Information Commissioner Decision Notice re OGC Stage Zero Gateway Reviews of the Identity Cards Programme - ruling in favour of full disclosure

| 2 Comments

Finally, after over a year and four months, the Information Commissioner has issued a Decison Notice regarding our complaint about the Office for Government Commerce's refusal to publish the Stage Zero Gateway Reviews of the Home Office's Identity Cards Programme.

Basically, the Information Commissioner has ruled in our favour, and has dismissed the OGC's public interest exemption claims under "Section 33 - audit functions" and "Section 35 - formulation and development of government policy."

The OGC have 28 days to lodge an appeal with the Information Tribunal, or else they must, by law, disclose the requested information within 35 calendar days.

Read the full text: Information Commissioner Decision Notice re OGC Stage Zero Gateway Reviews of the Identity Cards Programme (11 pages)

Apart from shedding some light on the controversial Idenity Cards Programme, which the Information Commissioner deems to be of such national impact on the general public, that more transparency and open government is required, this ruling is also notable for the way in which the OGC's excuse for secrecy, namely that publication might reduce the frank and open discussions which a Gateway Review collates and analyses anonymously. The Information Commissioner basically cited the Civil Service Code back att the OGC - it is the duty of Civil Servants to be frank, open and honest with their best and most professional opinions and advice, at all times, and publication of Gateway Reviews should make no difference to this.

This is highly significant, as even Select Committees of the House of Commons, such as the Public Accounts Committee or the home Affairs Committee have not been given access to OGC Gateway Reviews, even in private.

The OGC even tried to prevent the Information Commissioner from sending him a hardcopy of the Gateway Reviews, but eventually had to relent.

5.4 Nature of the Project being reviewed

The subject of these Reports, i.e. identity cards, will have a significant impact on the lives of individuals and their relationship with the state. The Commissioner considers that this in itself presents a very strong argument in favour of disclosure. The public should therefore be kept informed as far as possible as to how the programme is progressing and what the impact on them of identity cards will be. Disclosure is likely to enhance public debate of issues such as the programme's feasibility and how it is being managed. It will also allow the identification of project risks and practical concerns. It could also go some way towards educating the public by allowing it to develop a better understanding of the issues surrounding the development of identity cards. In the Commissioner's view the nature of the identity card project and its implication for citizens is in itself a highly significant factor in deciding in favour of disclosure.

The Commissioner is mindful of the OGC's view that because the programme is of such great public importance, there is a strong public interest in the programme being successful. The OGC argues that it is therefore essential that the integrity of the Gateway Process is maintained and not damaged in any way. The Commissioner has taken this into account but still considers that allowing the public an opportunity to better understand the development of the ID card programme outweighs the public interest arguments put forward by the OGC. In any event, the Commissioner is not persuaded that that disclosure of the requested information will damage the Gateway process in the way the OGC has suggested it will.

5.5 Content of the Reports and the impact on candour of Interviewees

The Commissioner is mindful of the OGC's view that the release of the report would make future prospective interviewees and interviewers less willing to participate in the Gateway process. However, in this case he is not persuaded by this argument.

In the Commissioner's opinion the Reports do not contain any information which would cause participants to be less willing to contribute openly and fully in future Gateway Reviews. The Commissioner has noted that during his discussions with the OGC it accepted these Reports were prepared at a very early stage in the life of a project. Because these Gate Zero Reviews were carried out at an early stage, it concentrates more on the practical issues of ensuring the right personnel and management structure is in place. It is difficult to envisage how disclosure of information of this sort could lead to contributors being less candid with their views. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Reports consist of material one would expect to see in relation to the early stages of any major governmental programme.

Gateway reports do not attribute comments to any particular person, although the Commissioner recognises that in some cases the nature of the information is such that it may be possible to attribute content to a particular individual. However, even if it is possible to do this, the Commissioner is still not convinced that disclosure of the requested information would, or would be likely to, lead to contributors being less candid in future reports. Should there be evidence of this, the organisations involved must take the necessary measures to ensure that their staff continue to deliver the quality of advice that they are expected to provide as part of their official duties.

We await any appeal to the Information Tribunal with interest.

UPDATE: 30th August 2006

The Information Tribunal say that the OGC have lodged an appeal within the 28 days.

Keep an eye on their (not yet updated) webpage of pending appeals for more details.

2 Comments

The Information Commissioner has also published another Decision Notice on this topic, as a result of what was originally a Parliamentary Question by the former Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesman Mark Oaten MP.

Case Ref: FS50083104 Date: 31/07/06 Public Authority: HM Treasury Summary: The complainant made a request to know the traffic light status awarded to Gateway Reviews of the Identity cards programme which had been carried out by the Office of Government Commerce, an independent office of the Treasury. The information was refused on the grounds that it related to the formulation and development of government policy (section 35) and that disclosure would prejudice the exercise of the OGC's audit functions (section 33). The Commissioner's decision is that the public interest lies in the release of the information and that its release will not prejudice the exercise of the OGC's audit functions. Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI s.33 - Complaint Upheld; s.35 - Complaint Upheld. Full Transcript of Decision Notice FS50083104
(.pdf)

i.e. exactly the same dismissal of the Treasury's arguments for secrecy as in our Decision Notice.

nice work. fingers crossed!

Leave a comment

About this blog

This United Kingdom based blog has been spawned from Spy Blog, and is meant to provide a place to track our Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests to United Kingdom Government and other Public Authorities.

If you have suggestions for other FOIA requests,  bearing in mind the large list of exemptions, then email them to us, or use the comments facility on this blog, and we will see  what we can do, without you yourself having to come under the direct scrutiny of  "Sir Humphrey Appleby" or his minions.

Email Contact

Please feel free to email us your views about this website or news about the issues it tries to comment on:

email: blog @spy[dot]org[dot]uk

Here is our PGP public encryption key or download it via a PGP Keyserver.

WhatDoTheyKnow.com

WhatDoTheyKnow.com - FOIA request submission and publication website from MySociety.org

Campaign Buttons

cfoi_150.jpg
Campaign for the Freedom of Information

NO2ID - opposition to the Home Office's Compulsory Biometric ID Card
NO2ID - opposition to the Home Office's Compulsory Biometric ID Card and National Identity Register centralised database.

Watching Them, Watching Us, UK Public CCTV Surveillance Regulation Campaign
UK Public CCTV Surveillance Regulation Campaign

Peaceful resistance to the curtailment of our rights to Free Assembly and Free Speech in the SOCPA Designated Area around Parliament Square and beyond

Parliament Protest blog - resistance to the Designated Area restricting peaceful demonstrations or lobbying in the vicinity of Parliament.

irrepressible_banner_03.gif
Amnesty International 's irrepressible.info campaign

Yes, Minister

Yes, Minister Series 1, Episode 1, "Open Government" First airtime BBC: 25 February 1980

"Bernard Woolley: "Well, yes, Sir...I mean, it [open government] is the Minister's policy after all."
Sir Arnold: "My dear boy, it is a contradiction in terms: you can be open or you can have government."

FOIA Links

Campaign for the Freedom of Information

Office of the Information Commissioner,
who is meant to regulate the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Scottish Information Commissioner,
who similarly regulates the Freedom of Information Act (Scotland) 2002

Information Tribunal - deals with appeals against decisions by the Information Commissioners.

Freedom of Information pages - Department for Constitutional Affairs

Friends of the Earth FOIA Request Generator and links to contact details for Central Government Departments and their Publication Schemes

UK Government Information Asset Register - in theory, this should point you to the correct Government documents, but in practice...well see for yourself.

Access all Information is also logging some FOIA requests

foi.mysociety.org - prototype FOIA request submission, tracking and publication website

Blog Links

Spy Blog

UK Freedom of Information Act Blog - started by Steve Wood, now handed over to Katherine Gundersen

Your Right To Know - Heather Brooke

Informaticopia - Rod Ward

Open Secrets - a blog about freedom of information by BBC journalist Martin Rosenbaum

Panopticon blog - by Timothy Pitt-Payne and Anya Proops. Timothy Pitt-Payne is probably the leading legal expert on the UK's Freedom of Information Act law, often appearing on behlaf of the Information Commissioner's Office at the Information Tribunal.

Syndicate this site (XML):

Recent Comments

  • Murray: nice work. fingers crossed! read more
  • wtwu: The Information Commissioner has also published another Decision Notice on read more

February 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            

Categories