tonight's podcast is here! episode 170. i'm a little self-conscious about it on multiple levels - 1) i don't think i expressed my point very clearly, and 2) i'm always self-conscious whenever i ramble on about religion/philosophy, etc. hm. in mulling it over, and re-listening, the main point i wish i'd made better is the simple fact that the "both/and" worldview, by definition, allows for the "either/or" within it. and, in this sense, the oversimplification of the dilemma
ravi zacharias portrays on his podcast is untrue and unfair.
as i see it, the "both/and" (or "pantheist," as zacharias calls it) perspective embodies an understanding that
both "either/or"
and "both/and" are appropriate ways of thinking - each in their place and time. science, mathematics, engineering, logic - these are all areas of life and knowledge where the "either/or" mindset is appropriate and unquestionably superior. absolutely. alternatively - feeling, love, opinion, metaphysics, faith, the supernatural - anything that facts can't prove - are the domain of "both/and." the whole truth is both. and - in this sense - the dilemma between
either "both/and"
or "either/or" is a completely false choice.
the fact that both sides are necessary and real and true (and powerfully relevant) in human life seems reasonable and balanced and true to me. and, honestly, i think it's an equal failing to err in either direction. if we force the "either/or" onto love and faith, we end up with dogmatic fundamentalism that's deaf to the complexity and variety of human experience. if we apply the "both/and" to science and logic, we create a false nonsense-world where nothing can be known or said about anything. both extremes seem equally insane to me. the only way to fully understand and engage with the whole of life, is to try to understand and embrace both perspectives appropriately. this is hard to do, obviously. it takes more than a lifetime, for any of us. but i think our time is much better spent here - exploring where and when to apply each - than tilting at the windmills of our neighbors and perceived-to-be enemies.
so, anyway. yes. that's what i meant to say tonight. it's just my opinion, so a "both/and" situation, clearly. ;) the other side has a point. and, if you're interested in learning more about that, i hope you'll visit the ravi zacharias' podcast
"let my people think".
as always, and most of all, many thanks go out to our musical guests tonight -
marianne barlow,
the mannequins, and
slyway.
happy december 2nd,
russell